Not having enny encyclopedia from which tew sponge mi informashun, and
then pass it oph for mi own creashun, i shall be forced, while talking
about the louse, “tew fight it out on the line” ov observashun, and when
mi knowledge, and experience gives out, i shall tap mi imaginashun, ov
which i hav a crude supply.
Book edukashun iz a phatting thing, it makes a man stick out with other
folks opinyuns, and iz a good thing tu make the vulgar rool up the white
ov their eyes, and wonder how enny man could ever kno so mutch wisdum.
Schooling, when I waz a colt, didn’t lie around so loose az it duz now,
and learning waz picked up oftner by running yure head aginst a stun
wall, than by enny other kind ov mineralogy.
I have studied botany all day, in a flat meadow, pulling cowslops for
greens, and then classified them, by picking them over and gitting them
reddy for the pot.
All the astronomy i ever got i larnt in spearing suckers bi moonlite,
and mi geoligy culminated at the further end of a woodchucks hole,
espeshily if i got the woodchuck.
Az for moral philosophy and rhetorick, if it iz the science ov hooking
green apples and water-mellons 30 years ago, and being auful sorry for
it now, i am up head in that class.
But all this iz remote from the louse.
The louse iz a familiar animal, very sedentary in hiz habits, not apt
tew git lost. They kan be cultivated without the aid ov a guide book,
and with half a chance will multiply and thicken az much az pimples on
the goose.
Thare iz no ground so fruitful for the full development ov this little
domestick collateral, az a districkt school hous, and while the yung
idea iz breaking its shell, and playing hide and go seek on the inside
ov the dear urchins skull, the louse iz playing tag on the outside, and
quite often gets on to the school mom.
I hav alwus had a hi venerashun for the louse, not bekause i consider
them az enny evidence of genius, or even neatness, but becauze they
remind me ov my boyhood innocence, the days away back in the alpahabet
ov memory, when i sot on the flatt side ov a slab bench, and spelt out
old Webster with one hand, and stirred the top ov my head with the
other.
Philosophikally handled, the louse are gregarious, and were a complete
suckcess at one time in Egypt, bible historians don’t hesitate tew say,
that they were aul the rage at that time, the whole crust ov the earth
simmered and biled with them, like a pot ov steaming flax seed, they
were a drug in the market.
But this waz more louse than waz necessary, or pleasant, and waz a
punishment for sum sin, and ain’t spoke ov, az a matter tew brag on.
The louse are all well enuff in their place, and for the sake ov
variety, perhaps a few ov them are just az good az more would be.
They were desighned for sum wize purpose, and for that very reason, are
respektabel.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account