The Confessions of Harry Lorrequer — CompleteLever, Charles
General
The Confessions of Harry Lorrequer — Complete
Lever, Charles
Fiction
“But sir, you must surely have misunderstood me. I only asked for the
kettle, Mr. Cudmore.”
“The devil a more,” said Cud, with a sneer.
“Well, then, of course”—
“Well, then, I’ll tell you, of course,” said he, repeating her words;
“the sorrow taste of the kettle, I’ll give you. Call you own skip—Blue
Pether there—damn me, if I’ll be your skip any longer.”
For the uninitiated I have only to add, that “skip” is the Trinity
College appellation for servant, which was therefore employed by Mr.
Cudmore, on this occasion, as expressing more contemptuously his sense
of the degradation of the office attempted to be put upon him. Having
already informed my reader on some particulars of the company, I leave
him to suppose how Mr. Cudmore’s speech was received. Whist itself was
at an end for that evening, and nothing but laughter, long, loud, and
reiterated, burst from every corner of the room for hours after.
As I have so far travelled out of the record of my own peculiar
confessions, as to give a leaf from what might one day form the matter
of Mr. Cudmore’s, I must now make the only amende in my power, by
honestly narrating, that short as my visit was to the classic precincts
of this agreeable establishment, I did not escape without exciting my
share of ridicule, though, I certainly had not the worst of the joke,
and may, therefore, with better grace tell the story, which, happily
for my readers, is a very brief one. A custom prevailed in Mrs.
Clanfrizzle’s household, which from my unhappy ignorance of
boarding-houses, I am unable to predicate if it belong to the genera at
large, or this one specimen in particular, however, it is a
sufficiently curious fact, even though thereby hang no tale, for my
stating it here. The decanters on the dinner-table were never labelled,
with their more appropriate designation of contents, whether claret,
sherry, or port, but with the names of their respective owners, it
being a matter of much less consequence that any individual at table
should mix his wine, by pouring “port upon madeira,” than commit the
truly legal offence of appropriating to his own use and benefit, even
by mistake, his neighbour’s bottle. However well the system may work
among the regular members of the “domestic circle,” and I am assured
that it does succeed extremely—to the newly arrived guest, or
uninitiated visitor, the affair is perplexing, and leads occasionally
to awkward results.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account