The Conflict of Religions in the Early Roman EmpireGlover, T. R. (Terrot Reaveley)
Religion
The Conflict of Religions in the Early Roman Empire
Glover, T. R. (Terrot Reaveley)
Christianity and other religions; Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Rome -- Religion
Pupils gathered round him and he became famous, as we can see in the
reminiscences of Aulus Gellius.[67] Sixty or seventy years after his
death a man bought his old earthenware lamp for three thousand
drachmas.[68] Even in his lifetime men began to come about "the
wonderful old man" who were hardly serious students. They wished, he
says, to occupy the time while waiting to engage a passage on a
ship--they happened to be passing (_parodos estin_) and looked in to
see him as if he were a statue. "We can go and see Epictetus
too.--Then you go away and say; Oh! Epictetus was nothing! he talked
bad Greek--oh! barbarous Greek!"[69] Others came to pick up a little
philosophic language for use in public. Why could they not
philosophize and say nothing? he asked. "Sheep do not vomit up their
grass to show the shepherd how much they have eaten--no! they digest it
inside, and then produce wool and milk outside."[70] He took his
teaching seriously as a matter of life, and he looked upon it as a
service done to mankind--quite equivalent to the production of "two or
three ugly-nosed children."[71] He has a warm admiration for the Cynic
philosopher's independence of encumberments--how can he who has to
teach mankind go looking after a wife's confinement--or "something to
heat the water in to give the baby a bath?"[72]
These then are the two great teachers of Stoicism, the outstanding
figures, whose words and tones survive, whose characters are familiar
to us. They are clearly preachers, both of them, intent on the
practical reformation of their listeners or correspondents. For them
conduct is nine-tenths of life. Much of their teaching is of course
the common property of all moral teachers--the deprecation of anger, of
quarrelsomeness, of self-indulgence, of grumbling, of impurity, is
peculiar to no school. Others have emphasized that life is a campaign
with a general to be obeyed, if you can by some instinct divine what he
is signalling.[73] But {54} perhaps it was a new thing in the Western
World, when so much accent was laid on conduct. The terror of
contemporary life, with its repulsiveness, its brutality and its
fascination, drove men in search of the moral guide. The philosopher's
school was an infirmary, not for the glad but for the sorry.[74] "That
man," says Seneca, "is looking for salvation--_ad salutem spectat_."
[Sidenote: Self-examination]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account