The conquest of the great Northwest, Volume 1 (of 2): $b Being the story of the adventurers of England known as the Hudson's Bay Company. New pages in the history of the Canadian northwest and western statesLaut, Agnes C.
History
The conquest of the great Northwest, Volume 1 (of 2): $b Being the story of the adventurers of England known as the Hudson's Bay Company. New pages in the history of the Canadian northwest and western states
Laut, Agnes C.
Hudson Bay -- History; Hudson's Bay Company; Northwest, Canadian
Such prosperity excited envy. The fur buyers and pelt workers and skin
merchants of London were up in arms. People began to question whether
a royal house, which had been deposed from the English throne, had any
right to deed away in perpetuity public domain of such vast wealth
to court favorites. Besides, court favorites had scattered with the
ruined Stuart House. Newcomers were the holders of the Hudson’s Bay
Company stock. What right had these newcomers to the privileges of such
monopoly? Especially, what was the meaning of such dividends, when the
Company regularly borrowed all the money needed for working operations?
As late as 1685, the Company had borrowed £2,000 at 6 per cent. from
its own shareholders, and after French disasters began to injure its
credit in the London market, it regularly sent agents to borrow money
in Amsterdam.
The Company foresaw that the downfall of the Stuarts might affect its
monopoly and in 1697 had applied for the confirmation of its charter
by Parliament. Against this plea, London fur buyers filed a counter
petition: (1) It was too arbitrary a charter to be granted to private
individuals. (2) It was of no advantage to the public but a mere
stockjobbing concern, £100 worth of stock selling as high as £300, £30
as high as £200. (3) Beaver purchased in Hudson Bay for 6d sold in
London for 6s. (4) Monopoly drove the Indians to trade with the French.
(5) The charter covered too much territory.
To which the Company made answer that not £1,000 of stock had changed
hands in the last year, which was doubtless true; for ’97 was the
year of the great defeat. The climate would always prevent settlement
in Hudson Bay, and most important of all—England would have lost all
that region but for the Hudson’s Bay Company. In its mood at the time,
that was a telling argument with the English Parliament. Negotiations
were in progress with France for a permanent treaty of peace. If the
Hudson’s Bay Company were dissolved, to whom would all the region
revert but to those already in possession—the French? And if the
impending war broke out, who would defend the bay from the French but
the Company?
By act of Parliament, the charter of the English Adventurers was
confirmed for a period of seven years. And more—when an act was passed
in 1708 to encourage trade to America, a proviso was inserted that the
territory of the Company should not be included in the freedom of trade.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account