The conquest of the great Northwest, Volume 1 (of 2): $b Being the story of the adventurers of England known as the Hudson's Bay Company. New pages in the history of the Canadian northwest and western statesLaut, Agnes C.
History
The conquest of the great Northwest, Volume 1 (of 2): $b Being the story of the adventurers of England known as the Hudson's Bay Company. New pages in the history of the Canadian northwest and western states
Laut, Agnes C.
Hudson Bay -- History; Hudson's Bay Company; Northwest, Canadian
Holding its privilege by virtue of royal favor, the Company was
expected to advance British dominion abroad and resist all enemies. For
exactly one hundred years (1682-1782) it fought the ground inch by inch
against the French. From 1698, agents were kept in Russia and Holland
and Germany to watch the fur markets there, and when the question of
designating the bounds between Russian Alaska and British Columbia,
came up between England and Russia, it was on the Hudson’s Bay Company
that the British Government relied for the defense of its case.
Similarly, when the United States took over Louisiana, the British
Government called on the Company in 1807 to state what the limits ought
to be between Louisiana and British America. But perhaps the most
notoriously absurd part the Company ever played internationally was in
connection with what is known as “the Oregon question.” The bad feeling
over that imbroglio need not be recalled. The modern Washington and
Oregon—broadly speaking, regions of greater wealth than France—were
at stake. The astonishing thing, the untold inside history of the
whole episode was that after insisting on joint occupancy for years
and refusing to give up her claims, England suddenly kow-towed flat
without rhyme or reason. The friendship of the Company’s chief factor,
McLoughlin, for the incoming American settlers of Oregon, has usually
been given as the explanation. Some truth there may be in this, for
the settlers’ tented wagon was always the herald of the hunter’s end,
but the real reason is good enough to be registered as melodrama to
the everlasting glory of a martinet officer’s ignorance. Aberdeen was
the British minister who had the matter in hand. His brother, Captain
Gordon in the Pacific Squadron was ordered to take a look over the
disputed territory. In vain the fur traders of Oregon and Vancouver
Island spread the choicest game on his table. He could not have his
English bath. He could not have the comforts of his English bed. He had
bad luck deerstalking and worse luck fishing. Asked if he did not think
the mountains magnificent, his response was that he would not give the
bleakest hill in Scotland for all these mountains in a heap. Meanwhile,
the Hudson’s Bay Company was wasting candle light in London preparing
the British case for the retention of Oregon. Matters hung fire. Should
it be joint occupancy, “fifty-four-forty or fight,” or compromise?
Aberdeen’s brother on leave home was called in.
“Oregon? Oregon?” Yes, Gordon remembered Oregon. Been there fishing
last year, and “the fish wouldn’t rise to the fly worth a d——! Let the
old country go!” This, in a country where fish might be scooped out in
tubfuls without either fly or line!
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account