The constitution violated : $b An essayButler, Josephine Elizabeth Grey
History
The constitution violated : $b An essay
Butler, Josephine Elizabeth Grey
Constitutional law -- Great Britain; Prostitutes -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- Great Britain
of the promoters of these laws may be described in the following words
of Mr. Burke:[82]—
“They who will not conform their conduct to the public good, and cannot
now support it by the prerogative of the Crown, have adopted a new
plan—they have totally abandoned the shattered and old-fashioned
fortress of prerogative, and made a lodgement in the stronghold of
Parliament itself. If they have any evil design to which there is no
ordinary legal power commensurate, they bring it into Parliament; in
Parliament the whole is executed from the beginning to the end; in
Parliament the power of obtaining their object is absolute, and the
safety of the proceeding perfect—no rules to confine, no after
reckonings to terrify.[83] Parliament cannot with any great propriety
punish others for things in which they themselves have been accomplices.
Thus the control of Parliament upon the executive power is lost, and
impeachment, that great guardian of the purity of the constitution, is
in danger of being lost even to the very idea of it.”
It must be confessed that the representatives of the people have been
false to the people in allowing this surrender of the rights and
liberties of any portion of them to be made in secret, and with that
stealthy swiftness too clearly indicative of the fears of those who
dared so to legislate. Ignorance and absence from the House have been
pleaded by many members of Parliament as an excuse for their virtual
complicity in this legislation. Their crime against the Constitution may
be less than that of those who framed and watched over this legislation,
but ignorance may not, any more than presumption, occupy the seat of our
lawgivers.[84]
Nevertheless our conviction is, that we shall ere long be able to reckon
the Commons once more, as in times past, on the side of right and of
constitutional freedom, as opposed to despotism; for we have this trust,
that the Commons of England will yet be found faithful, and that the
people’s representatives will once more prove themselves the champions
and the guardians of our liberties and of our national honour. Were it
not for this hope, were it not for the inestimable blessing of a
comparatively pure representative system of government, and still more,
were it not for our conviction of the love of virtue, freedom, and
justice which lives and burns in the great heart of England’s humbler
classes, to guide and inspire their representatives, our hearts might
die within us as we contemplate the spectacle of the growing infidelity
in high places to vital principles, and the audacious attempts to
undermine our Constitution, for which attempts, if ignorance be the
excuse, our case would be equally deplorable. Yet in spite of ignorance,
infidelity, or selfish passion on the part of our rulers, we
nevertheless retain that faith in the vigour and purity of English
representative government which is breathed in the following noble words
of De Lolme:[85]—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account