The Contemporary Review, January 1883: Vol 43, No. 1Various
Science
The Contemporary Review, January 1883: Vol 43, No. 1
Various
Arts -- Periodicals; Literature -- Periodicals; Political science -- Periodicals
[28] The author of "Natural Religion" thinks it mistaken in so declaring
itself. "Its invectives against God and against Religion do not prove
that it is atheistic, but only that it thinks itself so. And why does it
think itself so? Because God and Religion are identified in its view
with the Catholic Church; and the Catholic Church is a thing so very
redoubtable that we need scarcely inquire why it is passionately hated
and feared" (p. 37). But this is an error. God and Religion are not
identified, in the view of the Revolution, with the Catholic Church. It
will be evident to anyone who will read its accredited organs that it is
as implacably hostile to religious Protestantism as to Catholicism.
Perhaps I may be allowed to refer, on this subject, to some remarks of
my own in an article entitled "Free Thought--French and English,"
published in this REVIEW, in February last, p. 241.
[29] See his Preface to the Second Edition.
[30] Warburton, a shrewd observer enough, expressed the same view a
hundred years ago, with characteristic truculence:--"Mathematicians--I
do not mean the inventors and geniuses amongst them, whom I honour, but
the Demonstrators of others' inventions, who are ten times duller and
prouder than a damned poet--have a strange aversion to everything that
smacks of religion."--_Letters to Hurd_, xix.
[31] Preface to Second Edition, p. vii.
[32] _Ibid._, p. v.
[33] Summa, 1^ma 2^de qu. 60, art. 3.
[34] "Grammar of Assent," p. 389. 5th ed.
[35] What Wordsworth says is--
"We live by Admiration, Hope, and Love, And, even as these are well and
wisely fixed, In dignity of being we ascend."
This is widely different from the nude proposition that "we live by
admiration."
[36] See also p. 127.
[37] A good deal of information about Theophilanthropy and the
Theophilanthropists, in an undigested and, indeed, chaotic state, will
be found in Grégoire's "Histoire des Sectes Religieuses," vol. i.
[38] The Theophilanthropists were most anxious that the object of their
worship should not be supposed to be the Christian God. Thus in one of
their hymns their Deity is invoked as follows:--
"Non, tu n'es pas le _Dieu_ dont le prêtre est l'apôtre, Tu n'as point
par la Bible enseigné les humains."
[39] The author of "Natural Religion" says, Talleyrand; I do not know on
what authority. Grégoire writes:--"Au Directoire même on le raillait sur
son zèle thêophilantropique. Un de ses collègues, dit-on, lui proposait
de se faire pendre et de ressusciter le troisième jour, comme
l'infaillible moyen de faire triompher sa secte, et Carnot lui décoche
dans son _Mémoire_ des épigrammes sanglantes à ce sujet."--_Histoire des
Sectes Religieuses_, vol. I. p. 406. Talleyrand was never a member of
the Directory.
[40] Preface to second edition.
[41] "Eight Lectures on Miracles," p. 50.
[42] _Ibid._ See Dr. Mozley's note on this passage.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account