The Continental Monthly, Vol. 5, No. 5, May, 1864: Devoted To Literature And National PolicyVarious
History
The Continental Monthly, Vol. 5, No. 5, May, 1864: Devoted To Literature And National Policy
Various
Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; United States -- Politics and government -- 19th century -- Periodicals
and whether or no my Lord Marchmont ever did any good cannot now be
ascertained. All that is known of him is that he was very pertinacious
and very successful in his onslaughts upon his victims, for, whenever he
saw the name of any member of the House of Peers in a journal, he used
to make a motion against the printer for breach of privilege, summon him
before the bar of the House, and have him heavily fined. The House of
Commons followed suit. The old bone of contention, the reporting of the
debates, was raked up again. There were then two giants of reporting,
William Woodfall, who, from his wonderful retentive powers, was called
by the _sobriquet_ of Memory Woodfall, and William Radcliffe. It was in
1771 that the House proceeded to active measures by a majority of ninety
votes to fifty-five. Orders were given to arrest the printers,
publishers, and authors of the _Gazetteer and New Daily Advertiser_ and
the _Middlesex Journal, or Chronicle of Liberty_. The printers went into
hiding, and a reward of L50 was offered for their apprehension. Shortly
afterward, this raid was extended to the printers of the _Morning
Chronicle_, _St. James's Chronicle_, _General Post_, _London Evening
Post_, _Whitehall Evening Post_, and _London Packet_. Some of these
appeared at the bar of the House, and actually _made their submission on
their knees_. Miller, of the _London Evening Post_, declined to
surrender, and was, after some difficulty, arrested under a warrant from
the speaker. He was taken before the lord mayor, who was a member of the
House of Commons. The city's chief magistrate--let his name, Brass
Crosby, be remembered with honor--declared the warrant illegal,
discharged Miller, and committed the speaker's messenger for assault.
The same thing was done in the case of Wheble, of the _Middlesex
Journal_, who was taken before John Wilkes, then sitting as alderman at
Guildhall; and in that of Thompson, of the _Gazetteer_, who was taken
before Alderman Oliver. The ground for their discharge was that the
speaker's warrant had no force within the boundaries of the city,
without being countersigned by a magistrate of the corporation. The
House of Commons became furious, and ordered the attendance of Crosby
and Oliver, but, taught by old experience, did not in the first instance
think it desirable to meddle with Wilkes. The civic magistrates stood
their ground manfully, and produced their charters. The House retorted
by looking up the resolutions passed on various occasions against the
publication of the debates. Meanwhile a mob assembled outside, and
abused and hustled the members on their way to the House. After a fierce
debate, Oliver was committed to the Tower. The attendance of Wilkes was
then ordered for the 8th of April, but, in the mean time, the House,
like Fear as represented by Collins in his Ode to the Passions,
'back recoiled...
Even at the sound himself had made;'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account