The Cornhill Magazine, February, 1860 (Vol. I, No. 2)Various
General
The Cornhill Magazine, February, 1860 (Vol. I, No. 2)
Various
England -- Periodicals; English literature -- Periodicals; Short stories, English -- Periodicals
The wind is so piercing, and _my_ fingers are so benumbed, I can
scarcely hold the brush. Moreover, continual stooping over the net
makes the muscles ache unpleasantly, and suggests that each cast shall
be the final one. But somehow I have made this resolution and broken
it twenty times: either the cast has been unsuccessful, and one is
provoked to try again, or it is so successful that, as _l’appétit
vient en mangeant_, one is seduced again. Very unintelligible this
would be to the passers-by, who generally cast contemptuous glances at
us, when they find we are not fishing, but are only removing Nothings
into a glass jar. One day an Irish labourer stopped and asked me if I
were fishing for salmon. I quietly answered, “Yes.” He drew near. I
continued turning over the weed, occasionally dropping an invisible
thing into the water. At last, a large yellow-bellied Triton was
dropped in. He begged to see it; and seeing at the same time how
alive the water was with tiny animals, became curious, and asked
many questions. I went on with my work; his interest and curiosity
increased; his questions multiplied; he volunteered assistance; and
remained beside me till I prepared to go away, when he said seriously:
“Och! then, and it’s a fine thing to be able to name all God’s
creatures.” Contempt had given place to reverence; and so it would be
with others, could they check the first rising of scorn at what they do
not understand, and patiently learn what even a roadside pond has of
Nature’s wonders.
FOOTNOTES:
[17] _Entomostraca_ (from _entomos_, an insect, and _ostracon_, a
shell) are not really insects, but belong to the same large group of
animals as the lobster, the crab, or the shrimp, _i.e._ crustaceans.
[18] The student will find ample information in BAIRD’S _British
Entomostraca_, published by the Ray Society.
[19] Compare GEGENBAUR: _Grundzüge der vergleichende Anatomie_, 1859,
pp. 229 _und_ 269; also LEYDIG _über Hydatina senta_, in _Müller’s
Archiv_, 1857, p. 411.
[20] To avoid the equivoque of calling the parts of an animal, which
are capable of independent existence, by the same term as the whole
mass, we may adopt HUXLEY’S suggestion, and call all such individual
parts _zöoids_, instead of animals. DUGE’S suggested _zöonites_ in the
same sense.--_Sur la Conformité Organigue_, p. 13.
[21] STEIN: _Der Organismus der Infusionsthiere_, 1859, pp. 36–38.
[22] Zoospores, from _zoon_, an animal, and _sporos_, a seed.
[23] TREMBLEY in his admirable work. _Mémoires pour servir à l’histoire
d’une genre de Polypes d’eau douce_, 1744, furnished science with the
fullest and most accurate account of fresh-water Polypes; but it is a
mistake to suppose that he was the original discoverer of this genus:
old LEUWENHOEK had been before him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account