The Cornhill Magazine (Vol. I, No. 4, April 1860)Various
General
The Cornhill Magazine (Vol. I, No. 4, April 1860)
Various
England -- Periodicals; English literature -- Periodicals; Short stories, English -- Periodicals
The account of Dr. Dalton’s own peculiarity of vision by himself, offers
considerable interest. He says, speaking of flowers: “With respect to
colours that were white, yellow, or green, I readily assented to the
appropriate term; blue, purple, pink, and crimson appeared rather less
distinguishable, being, according to my idea, all referable to blue. I
have often seriously asked a person whether a flower was blue or pink,
but was generally considered to be in jest.” He goes on further to say,
as the result of his experience: “1st. In the solar spectrum three
colours appear, yellow, blue, and purple. The two former make a contrast;
the two latter seem to differ more in degree than in kind. 2nd. Pink
appears by daylight to be sky-blue a little faded; by candlelight it
assumes an orange or yellowish appearance, which forms a strong contrast
to blue. 3rd. Crimson appears muddy blue by day, and crimson woollen yarn
is much the same as dark blue. 4th. Red and scarlet have a more vivid and
flaming appearance by candlelight than by daylight” (owing probably to
the quantity of yellow light thrown upon them).
As anecdotes concerning this curious defect of colour vision, we may
quote also the following: “All crimsons appeared to me (Dr. Dalton) to
be chiefly of dark blue, but many of them have a strong tinge of dark
brown. I have seen specimens of _crimson claret_ and _mud_ which were
very nearly alike. Crimson has a grave appearance, being the reverse
of every showy or splendid colour.” Again: “The colour of a florid
complexion appears to me that of a dull, opaque, blackish blue upon
a white ground. Dilute black ink upon white paper gives a colour much
resembling that of a florid complexion. It has no resemblance to the
colour of blood.” We have a detailed account of the case of a young
Swiss, who did not perceive any great difference between the colour of
the leaf and that of the ripe fruit of the cherry, and who confounded the
colour of a sea-green paper with the scarlet of a riband placed close
to it. The flower of the rose seemed to him greenish blue, and the ash
gray colour of quick-lime light green. On a very careful comparison of
polarized light by the same individual, the blue, white, and yellow were
seen correctly, but the purple, lilac, and brown were confounded with
red and blue. There was in this case a remarkable difference noticed
according to the nature and quantity of light employed; and as the lad
seemed a remarkably favourable example of the defect, the following
curious experiment was tried. A human head was painted, and shown to
the colour-blind person, the hair and eyebrows being white, the flesh
brownish, the lips and cheeks green. When asked what he thought of this
head? the reply was, that it appeared natural, but that the hair was
covered with a nearly white cap, and the carnation of the cheeks was that
of a person heated by a long walk.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account