The conclusion attempted to be established by the preceding mode
of reasoning, is not of the kind, nor will it be so satisfactory
as, many desiderate. The sacred chronology, according to the common
interpretation, remains as it was; and no harmony can thus be established
betwixt it and the deductions of geology. Bring down the epochs to
thousands instead of millions of years, and still the DAYS of Scripture
are not explained. The historical and the scientific accounts of the
course of creation are just where they were, the one based on the word
of its Author, the other resting on rash or doubtful interpretations
of the phenomena of nature. Leave us, says the geologist, to grope our
own way: mystical as our records are, we disturb no established truth,
and imagination delights to lose itself in the far-distant past. Let
not, says the divine, the speculations of a new science—a science of
yesterday—be mixed up with more important matters of religion: we are
within the sacred precincts of revelation, and our oracles give forth no
dubious meanings—no isoteric doctrines for the initiated only.
The marvels of geology certainly are, in every view that can be taken
of them, deeply interesting to the mind. The volume of creation, read
in the light of its discoveries, is traced back through pages which
have been long hid from day; and these now make known to us a story
of life and death, of activities and enjoyments, of catastrophes and
revolutions, which surpass in wonder the inventions of the mere romance
writer, or all that regulated genius can pour “from pictured urn” of her
most fascinating lore. But be the time occupied in the elaboration of
these records what it may, the records themselves have an actual being,
and a language of intelligence indelibly impressed upon them. They are
genuine, authentic documents of their author. They may be misinterpreted.
Inferences may be deduced from them for which there is no warrant;
constructions put upon passages which they will not legitimately bear;
or the true key of the volume, in its great leading truths, may not as
yet have been found. Still the work is of God, wholly and entirely the
writing of his own hand.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account