Dr. Chalmers, in his work on natural theology,[3] has not, we think,
correctly apprehended the bearings of the argument for the existence of a
God drawn from the fact of the existence of a material world. “We do not
perceive,” he says, “how, on the observation of an unshapen mass, there
can from its _being_ alone, be drawn any clear or strong inference in
favor of its non-eternity: or that simply because it now is, a time must
have been when it was not. We cannot thus read in the entity of matter,
a prior non-entity, or an original commencement for it: and something
more must be affirmed of matter than merely that it is, ere we can
discern that either an artist’s mind or an artist’s hand has at all been
concerned with it.” Is this either sound reasoning or good philosophy?
The fact of the entity of matter does, necessarily and directly, lead to
the inference that it had a beginning. It could not originate itself,
and just the more as it is viewed in its mere materiality, so much the
stronger and irresistible the conclusion that there was no potentiality
inherent in itself to cause it to begin to exist. Strip these hills of
all their verdure—remove from the mind all consideration of their beauty,
variety, and softness of outline—divest that landscape of its ebb and
flow of tide—of all that constitutes the scene one of the most charming
on the face of the earth, and in its desolation and sterility you would
still in idea revert to a period when it was not. These shapeless, inert,
barren masses of rock, and soil, and sand, did not place themselves there
by any power of their own. Whether on Mount Horeb or Bencleugh, the
mind will learn, from its own inner voice, that the traces of Jehovah
are there—a Power, beyond and above, that called these rude piles into
being—the absence of all form and vitality in themselves the proof and
the witness of the Creator’s mind and the Creator’s hand. Death cannot
originate anything into life. Matter, as matter, cannot constitute nor
begin of itself to be. A scene like this could not now commence its own
being, and at no period in the past did it possess a single property of
self-existence. The entity and eternity of matter are, therefore, two
physically impossible things, as nothing but the one supreme intelligent
God can be at once self-existent and eternal, and that which is God
cannot be material.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account