The Cream of the Jest: A comedy of evasionsCabell, James Branch
Science
The Cream of the Jest: A comedy of evasions
Cabell, James Branch
Allegories; Authors -- Fiction; Dreams -- Fiction; Fantasy fiction
The transfiguring touch was to come, it seemed, from a girl’s lips; but
it had not; he kissed, and life remained uncharmed. It was to come from
marriage, after which everything would be quite different; but the main
innovation was that he missed the long delightful talks he used to have
with Kathleen (mostly about Felix Kennaston), since as married people
they appeared only to speak to each other, in passing, as it were,
between the discharge of various domestic and social duties, and
speaking then of having seen So-and-so, and of So-and-so’s having said
this-or-that. The transfiguring touch was to come from wealth; and it
had not, for all that his address was in the _Social Register_, and was
neatly typed in at the beginning of one copy of pretty much every appeal
sent broadcast by charitable organizations. It was to come from fame;
and it had not, even with the nine-day wonder over _Men Who Loved
Alison_, and with Felix Kennaston’s pictorial misrepresentation figuring
in public journals, almost as prodigally as if he had murdered his wife
with peculiar brutality or headed a company to sell inexpensive shoes.
And, at the bottom of his heart, he was still expecting the
transfiguring touch to come, some day, from something he was to obtain
or do, perhaps to-morrow.... Then he had by accident found out the
sigil’s power....
Men everywhere were living as he had lived. People got their notions of
life, if only at second- or third-hand, from books, precisely as he had
done. Even Amrou had derived his notions as to the value of literature
from a book. Men pretended laboriously that their own lives were like
the purposeful and clearly motived life of book-land. In secret, the
more perspicacious cherished the reflection that, any how, their lives
would begin to be like that to-morrow. The purblind majority quite
honestly believed that literature was meant to mimic human life, and
that it did so. And in consequences, their love-affairs, their maxims,
their passions, their ethics, their conversations, their so-called
natural ties and instincts, and above all, their wickednesses, became
just so many bungling plagiarisms from something they had read, in a
novel or a Bible or a poem or a newspaper. People progressed from the
kindergarten to the cemetery assuming that their emotion at every crisis
was what books taught them was the appropriate emotion, and without
noticing that it was in reality something quite different. Human life
was a distorting tarnished mirror held up to literature: this much at
least of Wilde’s old paradox—that life mimicked art—was indisputable.
Human life, very clumsily, tried to reproduce the printed word. Human
life was prompted by, and was based upon, printed words—“in the
beginning was the Word,” precisely as Gospel asserted. Kennaston had it
now. Living might become symmetrical, well-plotted, coherent, and
rational as living was in books. This was the hope which guided human
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account