The Cream of the Jest: A comedy of evasionsCabell, James Branch
Science
The Cream of the Jest: A comedy of evasions
Cabell, James Branch
Allegories; Authors -- Fiction; Dreams -- Fiction; Fantasy fiction
But it was as a lover that his rôle most engrossed him, in many dreams
wherein he bore for Ettarre such adoration as he had always wistfully
hoped he might entertain toward some woman some day, and had not ever
known in his waking hours. It was sober truth he had spoken at
Storisende: “There is no woman like you in my country, Ettarre. I can
find no woman anywhere resembling you whom dreams alone may win to.” But
now at last, even though it were only in dreams, he loved as he had
always dimly felt he was capable of loving.... Even the old lost faculty
of verse-making seemed to come back to him with this change, and he
began again to fashion rhymes, elaborating bright odd vignettes of
foiled love in out-of-the-way epochs and surroundings. These were the
verses included, later, under the general title of “Dramatis Personæ,”
in his _Chimes at Midnight_.
He wrote of foiled love necessarily, since not even as a lover might he
win to success. It was the cream of some supernal jest that he might not
touch Ettarre; that done, though but by accident, the dream ended, and
the universe seemed to fold about him, just as a hand closes. He came to
understand the reason of this. “Love must look toward something not
quite accessible, something not quite understood,” he had said at
Storisende: and this phrase, so lightly despatched, came home to him now
as pregnant truth. For it was this fact which enabled him to love
Ettarre, and had always prevented his loving any other woman.
All mortal women either loved some other man, and went with him
somewhither beyond the area of your daily life, and so, in time were
forgotten; or, else, they loved you, and laid bare to you their minds
and bodies—and neither of these possessions ever proved so remarkable,
when calmly viewed, as to justify continued infatuation therewith. Such
at least Felix Kennaston had always found to be the case: love did not
live, as lovers do, by feeding; but, paradoxically, got strength by
hungering. It should be remembered, however, that Felix Kennaston was a
poet....
* * * * *
He would sometimes think of the women who had loved him; and would
speculate, with some wistfulness, if it was invariably true, as with his
own amorous traffic, that love both kept and left its victims strangers
to each other? He knew so little of these soft-lipped girls and women,
when everything was said....
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account