(2) How can God create a planet, this earth? Where did he get his
material from? And was it possible for God to overcome the laws
of gravitation?
(3) Does it not seem strange that God, who seemed to have direct
dealings with Moses, did not give him more information about it?
(4) Theologians claim that God is the architect, the designer, the
first cause, the creator. Why did it take God to make this terrestrial
globe six days? If he was able to make it in six days, he might as
well have made it in one day, yes, one hour. If the Word was God,
and God was the Word, then the Word ought to have displayed this
magical art; he might have simply said, Go!
The term designer, architect, creator, implies skill, human skill,
a being that has brain.
(5) As to heaven, that part that is scripturally indicated as heaven
is the atmosphere.
(6) We are nowhere told where God was when he was doing all this
work. Whether he was floating in space among the meteors and asteroids,
or had his residence on Mars or Venus, we are not informed.
(7) This earth always had a form. A globe that revolves round its own
axis, once in twenty-four hours, and round the sun besides, cannot be
without form. It must necessarily have a globular form; nor was it
ever void. There is no such thing as a void in fact; it may appear
so to one ignorant of natural phenomena. That was undoubtedly the
case when that matter was written up.
(8) It must also be remembered that every planet in the system of
the sun receives a portion of his light. The contact of the sun's
rays with the elements of this earth is fatal to any such nonsensical
proposition as a void.
(9) As to "the darkness on the face of the deep," that could exist
only in isolated places, because of an intense fog or mist. The
whole surface of the earth could not have a fog at one time. That is
impossible. Wherever the sun shines there is light.
(10) "And the spirit of God moved on the face of the waters." What
waters? Where? We know that only one thing in this solar system can
disperse a fog; that is the sun.
Verse 3: "And God said, Let there be light, and there was light."
This is worse than childish; it is stupid.
(1) How could God have light when the sun was not made?
(2) And if the sun existed, it was silly on his part to say it.
Verse 4: "And God saw the light that it was good, and God divided
the light from the darkness."
How is it possible for any sane person to believe such nonsense,
when everybody with a grain of common sense knows that light and
darkness depend on the sun, as day and night do?
And this is said to have constituted the first day's work. If any man
will read it carefully he will perceive that the composition is of
a nature to entertain simple-minded people, children, who are unable
to understand the ordinary phases of nature.
The second day's work is very droll.
Verse 6: "And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the
waters," etc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account