The Creator, and what we may know of the method of creationDallinger, W. H. (William Henry)
Religion
The Creator, and what we may know of the method of creation
Dallinger, W. H. (William Henry)
Creation; Evolution; God; Religion and science
Hence, nothing but philosophical ruin can be the end of materialism
when enunciated in its grosser form. But our age is distinguished by
the existence of a brilliant philosophical materialism, which has
arrested, and is swaying, the deepest thought of our age, by the
opulence of its learning and resource, by the scientific accuracy and
insight of its abounding and perfect illustrations, and by the subtile,
but stately method and breadth of its generalizations; but beyond all,
by the fact that its world-famed author, Mr. Herbert Spencer, repels,
with warmth, persistence, and manifest integrity, the very suspicion of
‘materialism’!
Yet we are compelled to ask, of what value, of what real service,
are all the ideal and spiritual assumptions of his splendid and
fascinating philosophy? It acknowledges a _something_ beyond the
matter and the mechanism that fills the amplitudes of space; it even
designates this something a ‘power,’ But that power is declared, for
ever and infinitely, beyond the circumference of knowledge: it is the
‘absolute,’ the ‘unknowable;’ it can take no part, and become no agent
in, no factor of, any philosophy of the origin of the universe which we
construct. On the very terms of the philosophy itself, all in heaven
and earth, through all the past and all the future, can be accounted
for and explained without it. If the admission into its phraseology
of the existence of a ‘power,’ which is a name only, be taken as
sufficient reason, then this philosophy is not materialistic. But if it
be remembered that this ‘power’ is absolutely without function in this
philosophy of the construction of the universe,—if it be true to its
formula,—and that only matter and motion are asked for, its ultimate
materialism is a certainty, and, from its very subtilty, a peril.
To philosophical Theism the coarser Materialism can bring no lasting
danger. It ignores too much, and assumes too much; and treats with a
too manifest disdain the fundamental basis of our reasoning faculties.
It has many brilliant exponents; but foremost amongst them is Haeckel
of Jena, a man of large scientific attainments, a biologist of the
highest repute, and possessed of the keenest acumen. But these are not
the only, nor the essential factors, of a philosophic mind.
He has no hesitancy, no scruple. A Creator for him is a conception
for scorn, and he pours unceasing contempt upon the thought that he
or any of us are more than material organisms, alive for our little
day and then dead for ever. There is a future only for the race. The
universe is declared to be without purpose; it is moving matter, which,
by self-operation through immeasurable duration, has issued in laws
that exist without reason, and devoid of an originator, act, with the
deafness of the rock and the unconsciousness of the sea; producing
in the realm of life the weaker and the stronger, but only for that
unceasing war in which the stronger win.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account