The Creator, and what we may know of the method of creationDallinger, W. H. (William Henry)
Religion
The Creator, and what we may know of the method of creation
Dallinger, W. H. (William Henry)
Creation; Evolution; God; Religion and science
This is the second characteristic of that alone which lives. By
it, living matter is _sui generis_. Every instant, and at the same
temperature, this inconceivably minute speck, without discoverable
structure, effects analyses and complicated syntheses which either
baffle all the synthetic chemistry of man, or else, where he is able to
accomplish the simplest of the organic syntheses, it is by processes
and at temperatures that make all life impossible.
But more, this vital and inconceivably minute speck multiplies with
astounding rapidity in two ways; by the first and common process, in
the course of a minute and a half the entire body is divided into two
precisely similar bodies, each one being perfect; almost immediately
these again divide, and so on in geometric ratio through all the
populated fluid; the rapidity of this intense and wonderful vital
action transcending all thought. By this process alone a single form
may in three hours give rise to a population of organisms as great as
the human population of the globe.
But this is not all; at certain stages of the organism self-division
ceases. The final divisions result in strikingly modified forms of the
organism; these approach each other and melt together. They are then
shining globules without action, but at the end of a given time they
open, and pour out a continuous cloud of minutest spore or ova, which
are as countless as the sands; and from these arise again another host
of the organisms, which pass again through all the mystery and marvel
of this vital cycle.
And this is the third of the qualities that make what lives absolutely
unique amidst the things of earth.
This is life—whether vegetable or animal none can determine—in the
simplest form in which it can be known; life that is possessed only of
the irreducible properties which are inalienable, and which distinguish
it for ever and everywhere from what is not-life.
It is true that the philosopher, by the common consent of mind,
occupies the throne of intellect; but it is not, for all that, to
the esoteric philosopher, not to the deep mental seer, who girdles
all space, all duration, all phenomena with his thought, that nature
reveals her latest, her subtlest, her profoundest secrets. It is to
the patient student—nature’s loving learner, whose eye and ear are
trained to read her faintest writing and catch her lowest whisper—that
her deepest truths in all their strength and immediate bearing are
disclosed. Yet the fates of philosophies are determined by these.
Then what is the testimony of students and searchers as to the mode in
which life takes its origin to-day? Does life originate _in_ life? or
do we find that in our laboratories, and in the observed processes of
nature _now_, the not-living can be, without the intervention of living
things, changed into that which lives?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account