The Creator, and what we may know of the method of creationDallinger, W. H. (William Henry)
Religion
The Creator, and what we may know of the method of creation
Dallinger, W. H. (William Henry)
Creation; Evolution; God; Religion and science
But to meet this mental demand is no part of the business of science.
The study of phenomena, their succession and their classification, is
the essential work of science. It has no function, and is possessed of
no instrument with which to look behind or below the sequence, in quest
of some higher relation. The eye and the mind of the experimentalist
know only of antecedent and consequent. These fill the whole circle
of his research; let him find these, and he has found all. But
since a cause is no more a phenomenon, than a thought is a material
manifestation, that which fills the whole circumference claimed by
science does _not_ fill all the area legitimately held by reason. A
prevision of the order, and the methods of the changes of the universe,
is the ideal of science. But mind in its entirety refuses to be locked
within such limits. It looks deeper than sequences, and farther back
than phenomena; it demands, by the very laws of its existence, their
cause. A continuity of transformed causes undoubtedly explains a wide,
and ever-widening area of sequences. But that cannot annul the demand
of reason for causation. It simply drives it farther back, and higher
up, and indicates that the modes of action and relation originated by
the primal cause are only the more sublimely rhythmic. Count this a
lingering survival of ‘mere metaphysics’ who will, it is withal so
stalwart, so perennial in our consciousness, amidst all vicissitudes of
knowledge and reasoning, that whatever science may do, philosophy must
give it audience.
The researches of science, then, are physical. The observable, finite
contents of space and time are the subjects of its analysis. Existence,
not the cause of existence, succession, not the reason of succession,
method, not the origin of method, are the subjects of physical
research. A primordial cause cannot be the subject of experiment nor
the object of demonstration. It must for ever transcend the most
delicate physical reaction, the profoundest analysis, and the last link
in the keenest logic. Absolute knowledge concerning it can only be the
prerogative of itself.
But human reason is not only, and wholly, concerned with the brilliant
records of physical enquiry: it is conscious of powers within itself
that transcend and elude all the processes of physics, and the analyses
of mathematics. The activities of the mind are not exhausted, the
demands of the mind are not met, the persistent questions of reason
are not answered, by all the processes, all the products, and all the
possibilities of physical research combined.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account