The Creator, and what we may know of the method of creationDallinger, W. H. (William Henry)
Religion
The Creator, and what we may know of the method of creation
Dallinger, W. H. (William Henry)
Creation; Evolution; God; Religion and science
An instrument has actually been made which was competent to effect the
solution of quadratic equations whose roots are real. One has also
been made capable of effecting the determination of the real roots of
any equation. It is perfectly conceivable that an instrument could be
made which should go on finding the real roots only, for a measured
time, and then by a prearranged and provided method should suddenly, by
the very laws and principles of its construction, so change, that for
another period, or for evermore, it should also determine the imaginary
roots.
Is it not conceivable that infinite resource, infinite wisdom, infinite
prevision and power could in a manner which this illustration only
suggests have caused the non-vital universe to become in some parts
vital? Could not infinite power, infinite wisdom, the originator of
all that we call material phenomena, have prevised and preordered, in
the impenetrable mystery of ‘the beginning,’ that the creative laws of
evolution for an inorganic world, should, as they brought about the
completion of their perfect purpose, have carried with them from that
‘beginning’ preordered potentialities, that should, by the primal
volition of the Creator, emerge, as an inevitable and orderly sequence,
into the operation of higher activities and new laws?
If that may not be, it is not a divine being that is in our thought.
But if that may be, then the self-acting laws of nature are
self-acting, as the products of eternal mind and will. Each self-acting
phenomenon is, to us, an embodied thought of God; emerging in matter
now, as a consequence of the sublimity and perfection of the methods
divinely willed ‘in the beginning.’
Let this illustration weigh for what it will; this at least is clear,
that the mechanical philosophy, whether or not it refuses to be called
‘material,’ has proved its formula incompetent. Atomic matter without
property, affected by motion, with persistent relations between the
matter and the motion, can no more account for the universe even up to
the point of the origin of the lowest life, than the vibrations of a
musical chord can account for the joy begotten of music.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account