The Creator, and what we may know of the method of creationDallinger, W. H. (William Henry)
Religion
The Creator, and what we may know of the method of creation
Dallinger, W. H. (William Henry)
Creation; Evolution; God; Religion and science
Can it strip theology of one ray of the splendour of Deity, to find,
from the evidence of nature, that He thought, and willed into action,
the balanced forces and immutable laws, which were so related to each
other, and to the foreseen requirements of onward and upward movement,
that their progress is music, and their products are harmonies?—perfect
adjustments—and, amidst ever-changing circumstances, ever-changing
adaptations and self-adjusted design?
Can there be any splendour of the Infinite mind more ineffable and
effulgent than the evidence, in His works, that in the beginning He
determined the potency and prevision of all the life, and all the
adaptations, that ever have emerged or can emerge?
Will it be urged that this one comprehensive law of creative action,
with all its methods and potentialities complete in the beginning,
must denude history of miracle? must make all things inevitable
sequences, and every outcome in nature through all time only what must
be, when the moment for its emergence had come? And that therefore the
unforeseen would be impossible. I submit that such an inference is not
inevitable. The universe becomes one lasting act of the unsearchable
but immanent Eternal. The power by which the self-adjusting mechanism
of the universe acts, took its rise, and has its continuity, in Him.
A miracle, in its broadest aspect, is a wonderful event; something,
which from the known course of phenomena, science could not previse.
Science would stultify her past and make impossible her future, if
she affirmed that the unprevised and marvellous could not happen.
Says Professor Huxley: ‘A miracle, in the sense of a sudden and
complete change in the customary order of nature, is intelligible,
can be distinctly conceived, implies no contradiction; and therefore,
according to Hume’s own showing, cannot be proved false by any
demonstrative argument.’[31]
[Footnote 31: Huxley’s _Hume_, p. 133.]
Our knowledge of the observed processes of nature erects no mental
barrier to the occurrence of something never before observed.
Miracles are not, it is now broadly admitted, dependent on science,
but on _evidence_ for their possibility and truth. Nay, more, it is
conceivable that, what to us might be profoundly miraculous, might be
the outcome of sheer and unmodified natural law.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account