The cremation of the dead: considered from an aesthetic, sanitary, religious, historical, medico-legal, and economical standpointErichsen, Hugo
Religion
The cremation of the dead: considered from an aesthetic, sanitary, religious, historical, medico-legal, and economical standpoint
Erichsen, Hugo
Cremation
The Atlanta _Medical Journal_ states that two young ladies who drank
water from a spring situated on a hillside, near an old graveyard,
became severely ill. One was seized with pyæmia and diarrhœa, the other
with typhoid fever; both died. Cattle that drank of the water were also
made sick.
Professor Pumpilly has made certain by recent experiments that sandy
soil does not prevent bacterial infection from entering a well situated
at a considerable distance from cesspools and cemeteries. Indeed, he
claims further that “dry gravel and coarse sand do not prevent the
entrance into houses built upon them of those microorganisms which swarm
in the ground-air, around leaky cesspools, near graveyards, and in the
filthy made land of cities.”
Anent the idea that the gases and organic matters which arise from the
graves rapidly undergo changes by entering into new combinations when
brought into contact with the earth, Dr. John O. Marble, of Worcester,
Mass., says:—
“The monstrous delusion that the mere contact of the corpse with fresh
earth renders it innocuous, and suffices for safe disinfection, is
dissipated by overwhelming evidence. I distinctly remember my boyish
scruples concerning the water of a well situated not fifty yards from
graves in the churchyard adjoining my father’s garden. This old ‘God’s
acre’ I have a hundred times passed, in my timid boyhood, in the shades
of night, with palpitating heart, and a pace rivalled only by that of
Tam O’ Shanter’s steed from witch-haunted Kirk Alloway to the ‘Keystone’
of the ‘Brig o’ Doon.’ My father overcame my scruples concerning the
water by stating the belief then held, that the earth was a purifier and
a safe depurator, and that no harm could come to that well, 30 feet
deep, the pride and unfailing source of supply of the neighborhood. Yet
I, that same autumn, suffered a severe and nearly fatal attack of
typhoid fever, and another member of the family was similarly affected a
year later. The fever occurred when the well was low, and I have no
doubt, in the light of present knowledge of such dangers, that,
repulsive as is the thought, I drank water filtered through the bones of
my revered ancestors buried there, and that the polluted water caused
that illness. To those who criticise the advocates of cremation for
quoting ancient examples only, of harm from graves, this instance will
appear sufficiently recent and intimate.”
Opponents of incineration, who lay great stress upon the disinfecting
powers of the earth, forget that the soil is easily saturated by the
emanations from the dead. Professor Presscott, of the University of
Michigan, says in regard to this matter:—
“The purifying power of ground, like that of the air above it, is
limited and easily overcharged. If ground-air be loaded with more
putrescent vapor than it can oxidize, then poison is carried through the
porous earth.”
Dr. William Porter, of St. Louis, Mo., has recorded the following case:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account