The Crime of Caste in Our CountryDavenport, Benjamin Rush
History
The Crime of Caste in Our Country
Davenport, Benjamin Rush
Social problems; United States -- Social conditions -- 1865-1918
The cold and clammy arms of “caste,” in which the Republican party was
encircled, doomed it to defeat. All of the great virility with which it
was endowed when, as Abraham Lincoln’s Republican party, it represented
the “Common People,” was crushed out of it by this venomous python,
so that when it faced, in 1892, the arrayed resentment of the “Common
People,” it was but a shapeless, disfigured form, in which all the
beauty, purity, and strength with which it was endowed at the time of
its creation had ceased to exist. Had the Republican party retained
the vigor that marked its young manhood before it became suffocated by
this mass of putrid matter, called aristocracy, there would have been
another story to tell of the election November 8, 1892.
Had the argument been well defined, as it was in the last election,
with parties of equal merit in the eyes of the people, possessing
equally the virtues and spirit of the American people--had we arrayed
upon one side the Democratic party, with its oriflamme of “Free Trade,
State Banks, and No Force Bill,” and upon the other side marshaled the
Republican hosts under a leader like Lincoln, a man of the people, upon
whose standard should be written, “Protection for American Industries,
Sound Money Guaranteed by the Faith of the Nation, and Fair Election,”
can any one who is fair doubt as to what the issue would have been?
It was not, Novembers, 1892, a battle between the Republican party
and the Democratic party, and when journals like the New York _Sun_
would attempt to yoke the people’s will by party principles and party
traditions, they are merely preparing a harness of cobwebs, which
public opinion will tear asunder, and ring the death-knell of the
Democratic party in so doing.
The New York _World_, November 10th, publishes a remarkable editorial,
in which it recites, among other things, what this victory does _not_
mean. The editorial is given, because, if it be correct--and the New
York _World_ is certainly good authority--then it surely does not mean
a victory for the Democratic party, while it does mean a victory for
the “Common People,” the democratic masses, and such cries in future
as that of the New York _Sun_ against an income tax, because it is
contrary to the Democratic party, will be meaningless, inasmuch as the
Democratic party has not won this victory, and Grover Cleveland was not
elected President by the Democratic party.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account