The Criticism of the Fourth Gospel: Eight Lectures on the Morse Foundation, Delivered in the Union Seminary, New York in October and November 1904Sanday, W. (William)
Religion
The Criticism of the Fourth Gospel: Eight Lectures on the Morse Foundation, Delivered in the Union Seminary, New York in October and November 1904
Sanday, W. (William)
Bible. John -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
‘The multitude answered, Thou hast a devil: who seeketh to kill
thee? Jesus answered and said unto them, I did one work, and ye all
marvel. For this cause hath Moses given you circumcision (not that
it is of Moses, but of the fathers); and on the sabbath ye
circumcise a man. If a man receiveth circumcision on the sabbath,
that the law of Moses may not be broken; are ye wroth with me,
because I made a man every whit whole on the sabbath?’ (vers. 20-3).
I do not think it can be doubted that arguments like this were just what
would be constantly heard at the first beginnings of Christianity. But
they belong to the time when it was just in the act of differentiating
itself from Judaism; and I cannot easily imagine that they would be so
clearly realized and so appropriately introduced later.
Of the same kind is much of the discussion in ch. viii. I do not
undertake to say that this discussion, or other discussions in the
Fourth Gospel, are given exactly as they really happened. I am quite
prepared to believe that especially the part in them taken by our Lord
Himself was a little different from that which He is represented as
taking. But, if I think this, it is because the narrative seems to me
(if it is not too much of a paradox to say so) even too true to the time
and circumstances in which the discussion took place. No doubt our Lord
is represented as holding Himself apart from and above the Jewish
controversialists. I feel sure that He did this; but, with the Synoptic
Gospels before me, I suspect that He did it in a slightly different, i.
e. in a more reserved and—if I may be forgiven the expression—delicate
way.
With thus much of preface I will just give a specimen of what I mean by
truth to the time and circumstances.
‘The Jews answered and said unto Him, Say we not well that thou art
a Samaritan, and hast a devil? Jesus answered, I have not a devil;
but I honour my Father, and ye dishonour me.... The Jews said unto
him, Now we know that thou hast a devil. Abraham is dead, and the
prophets; and thou sayest, if a man keep my word, he shall never
taste of death. Art thou greater than our father Abraham, which is
dead? and the prophets are dead: whom makest thou thyself?’ (vers.
48, 49, 52, 53).
‘Thou art a Samaritan, and hast a devil’; ‘Abraham is dead, and the
prophets.’ These are exactly the things that would be said, and that we
may be sure were said. But I am not satisfied with the hypothesis that
the author who wrote them was a Jew of Palestine. I believe that he was,
and must have been, an actual contemporary and eye-witness of what he is
recording.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account