"The extra expense, also, of erecting metallic-roofed houses was a
consideration. In 1833 I contemplated building a new range of hot-houses;
and being desirous of knowing how much they would cost, if erected of
metal, a plan of the range was prepared and sent to Birmingham, and another
to Sheffield, with a desire to be furnished with estimates for that
purpose. The estimate from Birmingham was 1,800_l._; and the other, from
Sheffield, was 1,850_l._ These appeared to me such enormous sums, that I at
once set about calculating how much the range would cost if built of wood
under my own inspection; and the result was, that I was able to complete
the whole range, including masonry (which was omitted in the metal
estimates), for less than 500_l._
"Besides the extra cost of metallic roofs, we must add the extreme heat of
such houses in hot weather, and their coldness in times of frost; the
liability to breakage of glass from expansion and contraction of the metal;
the very limited duration of the smaller portions, as sash-bars, from
corrosion, by exposure to the alternations of heat, cold, and moisture,
inseparable from gardening operations, and which could only be prevented by
making use of the expensive material, COPPER; and the difficulty, when
compared with wood, of repairing any damages, as a wooden roof could at any
time be set to rights by a common carpenter. These different items formed
in my mind so many objections to its use, and the same disadvantages soon
became generally apparent.
"It was now thought advisable by some parties that, in order to obviate the
many disadvantages in the use of metal, the rafters and frame-work of the
sashes ought to be made of wood, and the sash-bars of metal. This plan
certainly presented more advantages than the other, yet it was quite
obvious that materials so incongruous could never give satisfaction; and
accordingly, in a few years, as I had anticipated, the rage for these
structures gradually subsided, and the use of wood again became resorted to
by most persons, as the best material for horticultural purposes.
[Illustration: COMMON MODE OF GLAZING ROOFS.]
"In the construction of glass-houses requiring much light, there always
appeared to me one important objection, which no person seemed to have
taken up or obviated; it was this. In plain lean-to or shed roofs, the
morning and evening sun, which is on many accounts of the greatest
importance in forcing fruits, presented its direct rays at a low angle,
and, consequently, very obliquely to the glass. At those periods most of
the rays of light and heat were obstructed by the position of the glass and
heavy rafters, so that a considerable portion of time was lost both morning
and evening; it consequently became evident that a system by which the
glass would be more at right angles to the morning and evening rays of the
sun would obviate the difficulty, and remove the obstruction to rays of
light entering the house at an early and late hour of the day.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account