The Curious Lore of Precious Stones: Being a description of their sentiments and folk lore, superstitions, symbolism, mysticism, use in medicine, protection, prevention, religion, and divination. Crystal gazing, birth-stones, lucky stones and talismans, astral, zodiacal, and planetaryKunz, George Frederick
Religion
The Curious Lore of Precious Stones: Being a description of their sentiments and folk lore, superstitions, symbolism, mysticism, use in medicine, protection, prevention, religion, and divination. Crystal gazing, birth-stones, lucky stones and talismans, astral, zodiacal, and planetary
Kunz, George Frederick
Gems; Gems -- Folklore
That the foundation stones were inscribed with the names of the
apostles is expressly stated (Rev. xxi, 14), but it was not until the
eighth or ninth century that the commentators on Revelation busied
themselves with finding analogies between these stones and the
apostles. At the outset, the symbolism of the stones was looked upon
from a purely religious standpoint. Few of the early fathers—we may
except Epiphanius—thought or cared much for the stones themselves,
or knew much of them; but, in time, their natural beauty became more
and more highly developed as the lapidarian art demanded better cut
and choicer material, their supposed virtues came to the fore, and
the symbolism was strengthened and emphasized by a reference to their
innate qualities and also to their peculiar powers. The fact that
this part of the tradition was rather of pagan than of Christian
origin probably contributed to render it less attractive to the
early Christians, so that it was not until Christianity had become
practically universal in the Greek and Roman world and the opposition
to pagan traditions, as such, was weakened and, indeed, largely
forgotten, that the virtues of the stones were made prominent, and
certain parts of these superstitions were retained, as were some of the
pagan ceremonies in the Christian religion.
One of the earliest writers to associate directly with the apostles the
symbolism of the gems given as foundation stones of the New Jerusalem
by St. John in Revelation xxi, 19, is Andreas, bishop of Cæsarea.
This author was at one time assigned by critics to the fifth century
A.D.,[430] but more recent investigation has shown that he probably
belonged to the last half of the tenth century. His exposition reads as
follows:[431]
The jasper, which like the emerald is of a greenish hue, probably
signifies St. Peter, chief of the apostles, as one who so bore
Christ’s death in his inmost nature that his love for Him was always
vigorous and fresh. By his fervent faith he has become our shepherd
and leader.
As the sapphire is likened to the heavens (from this stone is made a
color popularly called lazur), I conceive it to mean St. Paul, since
he was caught up to the third heaven, where his soul was firmly fixed.
Thither he seeks to draw all those who may be obedient to him.
The chalcedony was not inserted in the high-priest’s breastplate, but
instead the carbuncle, of which no mention is made here. It may well
be, however, that the author designated the carbuncle by the name
chalcedony. Andrew, then, can be likened to the carbuncle, since he
was splendidly illumined by the fire of the Spirit.
The emerald, which is of a green color, is nourished with oil, that
its transparency and beauty may not change; we conceive this stone to
signify John the Evangelist. He, indeed, soothed the souls dejected
by sin with a divine oil, and by the grace of his excellent doctrine
lends constant strength to our faith.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account