Detective and mystery stories; Stone, Fleming (Fictitious character) -- Fiction
Moreover, Mrs. Frothingham was looking at him sharply from the corner of
her eye. Clearly, she was watching him to see how he took it.
He didn't take it very well. The acknowledged presence of an outsider in
the house, for a not very plausible reason, was illuminating in his
estimation. She had been on the stairway. Had she been to Miss
Carrington's room? True, she said she went only to the landing,--but
pshaw, women had no regard for the truth! Had she and Count Charlier
planned between them to--bah, _why_ did this woman want to kill her
neighbor? Even if she were jealous of the Count's attention, would she go
so far as crime? No, of course not! He must question her further. And
yet, what good would that do, if she would not tell the truth?
Well, she was in the house at half-past eleven, that much was certain,
for Stephen Illsley's story and her own and also the butler's testimony
all coincided as to that.
And then, Detective Hardy, who had just returned from a short errand,
made a startling statement. He declared that the glove which had been
found clasped tightly in the dead fingers of the late Miss Carrington did
belong to Count Henri Charlier.
Mr. Hardy had been searching the Count's wardrobe, and though he did not
find the mate to that particular glove, he found many others, some worn
and some entirely unused, but all of the same size and made by the same
firm as the one now in the Coroner's possession!
Thus cornered Count Charlier reluctantly admitted that it was his glove.
"I denied it," he thus excused himself, "because I have no idea how it
came into Miss Carrington's possession, and I did not wish to implicate
her in an affair with my unworthy self."
"H'm," thought Gray Haviland, fixing his attention on the Count and on
the flustered Mrs. Frothingham; "a precious pair of adventurers! I expect
Scofield is right, we won't need an expert detective."
There was more of the inquest. But its continuance brought out no
developments not already here transcribed. There was much
cross-questioning and probing; there was much rather futile effort to
make all the strange details fit any one theory; there was variance of
opinion; and there was more or less dissension.
But as a final result, the Coroner's jury brought in a verdict that Miss
Lucy Carrington met her death by poison administered by a person or
persons unknown, who thereafter, probably for the purpose of diverting
attention from the poison, struck her a blow on the head. The jury in
their deliberation felt that Count Henri Charlier was implicated. But not
having sufficient evidence to make a charge, suggested to the detective
force that he be kept under surveillance.
X
BIZARRE CLUES
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account