The Dabistán, or School of manners, Volume 1 (of 3): translated from the original Persian, with notes and illustrations
Religion
The Dabistán, or School of manners, Volume 1 (of 3): translated from the original Persian, with notes and illustrations
Iran -- Religion; Religions
Two learned men having a dispute concerning the superiority of the
chosen Alí, “the Elect” (whose face may God honor), over the two
Shaikhs and the _Lord of the two lights_ (Osmar), (upon all of whom be
the mercy of the Almighty) having referred the dispute to Kaivan, he
observed:
“All four are the four perfections of the prophetic edifice;
All four are the four elements of the prophets’ souls.”
“The distinction between the two exalted parties is difficult, as two
of them claim supremacy on the celebrity (drum) of being
fathers-in-law to the Arab founder of religion; and the other two are
fitted for dignity, by being sons-in-law to the apostle of the Arabs.
But whereas all things are objects of the Almighty’s regard, the
excellent Alí, ‘the Lion of God,’ was esteemed so pre-eminent an
object of divine favor among the Moslems, that want of faith and
ignorance induced many to worship him as the true God, until this
great personage openly disclaimed such a pretension. Also during the
pontificate and caliphat of _Sadik_, ‘the faithful witness,’ the
powerful _Abubeker_, ‘the separator,’ the grand _Omar_, and that of
_Zu-l-Narain_, ‘the Lord of the two Lights,’ error misled many to such
a degree, that they denied their authority, until these legitimate
directors asserted their claims to that dignity.”[323]
He returned an answer of a similar description in a dispute between a
Jew, a Christian, and a Muselman, who were arguing about the
superiority of their respective prophets; some acknowledging Jesus as
God, the others as the Son of God. One day as a Christian and Muselman
were disputing with each other, the former allowing the death of
Jesus, and the latter believing him to be alive, Azar Kaivan said: “If
a person who knew not the direction of a road which formed his
destination, should in the course of his journey come to a dead body
lying down, and a living person seated, from which of the two ought he
to inquire his way?” As the disputants both replied, “from the living
person;” he then said to the Muselman: “Adopt thou the faith of Jesus,
as according to thy belief he is living.” He then added: “By life is
meant the life of the rational soul: in this Mohammed and Jesus are on
an equality; call your prophets the ‘eternal living:’ for life means
not the perpetuity of this body fashioned out of the elements, which
cannot accompany us beyond a hundred or a hundred and twenty natural
stages (years).” Azizi says:
“If the domestic fowl should fly along with the fowls of the air,
It could not proceed in flight beyond the summit of the wall.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account