[2] بوده ميمنس is the reading of the edition of Calcutta; the same spelling of _Budh_, or _Budah_, is found when the name of the legislator, properly _Buddha_, is introduced, as in p. 175 of the same edition, and elsewhere. But _Budah_ may also signify “past, gone,” and therefore “prior;” on that account D. Shea rendered the above name by _Purva_ (or “prior”) _Mimansa_. According to Colebrooke and Mr. Wilson, मीमांसा _Mímánsá_, signifies one of the philosophical systems of the Hindús, or rather a two-fold system, the first part of which is the _Purva Mímánsá_, or _Mímánsá_, simply; the second part, the _Uttara Mímansa_. “The prior Mímánsá, founded by Jaimini, teaches the art of reasoning, with the express view of aiding in the interpretation of the Vedas. The _Uttara_, or “latter,” commonly called the _Vedanta_, and commonly attributed to Vyasa, deduces from the Vedas a refined psychology, which goes to the denial of a material world.”――(_Colebrooke’s Essays._) But the above account of the Dabistán is not strictly and fully in accordance with this definition of the first Mímánsá, because it exhibits more of the Puranic than of the Vedáic doctrine, not without some particular notions. It appeared therefore best to adhere to the reading of the original text.――A. T. [3] Védá, the generic term for the sacred writings, or scriptures, of the Hindús. See a subsequent note about the four Védas.