The Dabistán, or School of manners, Volume 2 (of 3): translated from the original Persian, with notes and illustrations
Religion
The Dabistán, or School of manners, Volume 2 (of 3): translated from the original Persian, with notes and illustrations
Iran -- Religion; Religions
Among the Hindus are recommended as pious exercises, _Mantra_,[147]
_Homa_,[148] and _Dandavat_.[149] _Mantra_ signifies prayer; _Homa_ is
throwing clarified butter and like things into the fire, and reciting
prayers, in order to render propitious a certain divinity; _Dandavat_
is, when one prostrates himself like a stick before the object of
adoration, and touches the ground with the forehead. A person asked
Bhartari,[150] who was one of those adepts whom they call _Jnánis_:
“Dost thou recite mantras?” He replied: “I do.” That person asked
again: “What mantra?” He answered: “My breath, going out and in, is my
mantra.” That man continued to ask: “Dost thou perform Hóm?” The
answer was: “I do.” To the question, “And how?” the reply followed:
“By what I eat.” That person further inquired: “Dost thou practise the
Dańdavat?” After affirmation, being asked “At what time?” he said,
“When I sleep, stretched out to rest.” And this speech reminds me of
this sentence:
“_The sleep of the wise is preferable to the adoration of
the ignorant._”
The Hindus call _Déva árcháká_[151] the worshipper of an idol, that
is, one who is devoted to a divinity: which this people interpret to
be performing whatever rite a man himself chooses; because the deity
is the intellectual soul; to render it obsequious, is to perform the
act which it commands, that is, whenever it wills, to see with the
eyes, to hear with the ears, to smell with the nose, and so on, in
order to please one’s self. According to their account of the revealed
unity of God, all is _HE_. To say so is liable to censure; but it is
permitted to assert: “all is _I_.” Should one not attain to this
height of philosophy, he may choose the former thesis. The author of
the _Gulchén raz_, “the rose-garden of mystery,” says:
“Egotism belongs to God alone,
For he is the mystery; think him also the hidden source of illusion.”
This people are masters of themselves in their speeches and actions;
they know their origin and their end; and, occupied with themselves,
they are imprisoned in the gaol of the world. Sankara Atcharya, who is
distinguished among the Brahmans and the Sanyasis, professed this
doctrine, and to whatever side he turned his face, contentment
followed him. One day the adversaries and deniers of this creed
resolved to drive an elephant against him; if he do not fly but remain
firm, he is a saint; if otherwise, a bad man. When they had impelled
the animal against him, Sankara fled; then they said to him: “Why
didst thou fly before an illusion?” He replied: “There is no elephant,
nor I; and there was no flight: you saw it in a dream.” All the great
men among the Hindus are of this creed, and they agree that, in truth,
there is no faith but this, without regard to Avátars and Rakshasas:
all the enlightened Pandits have ranged themselves upon this side.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account