The Dabistán, or School of manners, Volume 3 (of 3): translated from the original Persian, with notes and illustrations
Religion
The Dabistán, or School of manners, Volume 3 (of 3): translated from the original Persian, with notes and illustrations
Iran -- Religion; Religions
“Dost thou not know that, when I went to the friend,
As soon as I arrived before him, I said: ‘It is he.’”[265]
Sabjání appears a (divine) revelation in his actions, steps,
attributes, and nature, and to have attained the summit of perfection.
He said that, with respect to the other world, there are several
classes of men. The one denies the absolute being; another interprets
it in an abstract manner of reasoning, inasmuch as they have
sufficient intelligence to be modest and conciliating. The
distinguished Súfis, without interpreting the different systems of
nations, which, in their separate creeds of various kinds and
religions, differ about the beforesaid object, view in the bodies the
agreeableness of imagery. Khiźer, Elías, Brahma, Ganésa, and all the
gods of India, these and the like representations, which in this world
have no reality, all are distinct objects of imagination. Essential is
what was said by Abu Nazer Farábí (may God illume his grave!) that the
common people view their creeds under the form of their imagination.
The author of this book heard also from the lord, the pious Sábjaní:
The contemplative man sees every one whom he loves and esteems,
frequently in dreams in a beautiful shape, and in an exalted state,
although to other people he may appear iniquitous; and the person whom
he knows to be depraved, will often be viewed by him in a repulsive
condition, although to the crowd he may appear glorious and powerful.
Hence follows, that the learned among the contemplative persons make
use of a negative argument in their creed, in order that it may become
evident what the truth really is. When any one sees a person of high
rank, such as a prophet, an Imám, or any dignified individual, in a
state of some deficiency, he views his own defects in his
understanding, spirit, heart, or nature; and as these things are but
seeming defects in the great personage, he must endeavor to remove
them from himself. In like manner, if one sees a person in good health
(appearing to him) in a state of illness, there is illness in his own
state, and if he thinks him bad with regard to his own faith, he ought
to be somewhat disposed to think that person good.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account