The danger and immodesty of the present too general custom of unnecessarily employing men-midwives: Being the letters which lately appeared under the signature of a man-midwife. With an introduction, a treatise on the milk, and an appendix. — John Shaqi
The danger and immodesty of the present too general custom of unnecessarily employing men-midwives: Being the letters which lately appeared under the signature of a man-midwife. With an introduction, a treatise on the milk, and an appendix.Anonymous
History
The danger and immodesty of the present too general custom of unnecessarily employing men-midwives: Being the letters which lately appeared under the signature of a man-midwife. With an introduction, a treatise on the milk, and an appendix.
Anonymous
Midwifery -- England -- Early works to 1800
And how should this be otherwise! a long _un-impassioned_ practice,
_early_ commenced, and _calmly_ pursued, is absolutely requisite to give
men _by art_, what women attain _by nature_.—Dr. Hunter, very wisely,
very justly has said, that “Labour is nature’s work.”—Nature _ought to be
suffered_ nine hundred and ninety-nine times out of a thousand, _to do
her own work_. All the knowledge _young_ men can possibly obtain, must be
from _dead_ bodies—for is it in common sense to suppose, that a young lad
can explore the secret recesses of Venus, so as to be _physically_ well
acquainted with those parts in _living_ females? No—fires must quickly
be raised, which unavoidably will confuse all his discerning _reasoning_
faculties—and _ART must instantly be lost in NATURE_. Dr. Hunter, indeed,
and one or two men besides, _may perhaps_, by the help of _cold_
constitutions, and dint of very long practice, do their business _nearly
as well_ as women—by leaving all _to nature_—but, if my life and fortune
here, and salvation hereafter, depended on the life of any pregnant
woman, and that of her infant, I would stake all I held valuable on her
being attended by any old woman midwife in England, in preference to any
man in the world. Whoever reads Nihel’s Midwifery, will be satisfied of
this truth, that _women are infinitely safer than men_.
Who can wonder at the profligacy of the times, when it is known that even
women of character soon become so callous to the bashfulness which ought
to characterize their sex (from being habituated to the familiarities
of their Men-midwives) that they will not scruple informing a male
visitor, without even blushing, “I was not very well for some days in
the country—so I came to town on purpose to be satisfied by Dr. ⸺ that
I was in a good way—_the dear man_ has told me that _the child lies
right_—and I am perfectly easy.” Monstrous! that a lady can pretend to
any degree of modesty, and yet, _not content_ with having _a strange_ man
attending her _for hours_ when in labour (most of that time intimately
acquainted with _every_ part) she can, without any compunction, send for
a man, and admit him without reserve _to the most unbounded_ liberties,
at a time too, when she is _as able_ to walk, and _do every other act_
of life, as if she was not pregnant! Pray let me ask her ladyship, _how_
did “_The dear man_,”—“_sweet Dr. ⸺_,” _find out_ how the child lay?—By
means _sufficient to taint the purity_, and _fully the chastity_, of
any woman breathing!—I will boldly affirm, that, whoever admits a man
to those _licentious_ freedoms, cannot pretend to answer for what _may_
be the consequences. If _the last_ circumstance does not take place, it
must be owing, either to an extraordinary insensibility in the man, or
to the woman’s not suiting his taste, having such choice of beauties to
visit. Suppose, for argument’s sake, that the fictitious Goddess of
Chastity, Diana herself, was on earth, and employed me to satisfy her
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account