The danger and immodesty of the present too general custom of unnecessarily employing men-midwives: Being the letters which lately appeared under the signature of a man-midwife. With an introduction, a treatise on the milk, and an appendix.Anonymous
History
The danger and immodesty of the present too general custom of unnecessarily employing men-midwives: Being the letters which lately appeared under the signature of a man-midwife. With an introduction, a treatise on the milk, and an appendix.
Anonymous
Midwifery -- England -- Early works to 1800
I should be sorry to entertain so bad an opinion of the generality of my
fair countrywomen, as to suppose them hardened by the depraved custom
of the times, beyond a possibility of being roused to a sense of danger
for themselves and infants, and to a sense of virtue. Doctor Hunter
is, beyond dispute, _the best Man_-midwife in the world—yet, let the
advocates for the _indiscriminate_ use of men lay their hands on their
hearts, and answer me ingenuously this question—Suppose any _three_ of
the _best_ Midwives in London had lost _in their lives, the same number_
of women of fashion _Doctor Hunter_ has lost _within these two or three
years_,[3] would they not have exclaimed loudly, and _taken advantage_
of those deaths _to prove the danger of employing women_? All England
would have rung of their mismanagement—and the women would have been
ruined!—There are women in London who have laid several thousands, and
yet never lost either a mother or an infant.
Though the abandoned custom exculpates ladies in the estimation of a
dissipated world, yet I recommend to their confederation _how their
thoughts, during the visits_ of Men-midwives, will stand the test of the
penetrating eye of their Creator.
I hope to live to see the day, when innate modesty will be the
characteristic of English women; and _of course_, when a lady will not be
more publickly branded with infamy for the most barefaced prostitution,
than for the effrontery which _will then_ be necessary to enable a woman
wantonly to employ
A MAN-MIDWIFE.
[3] I would by no means be understood to insinuate the most distant
reflection on Dr. Hunter’s management. I have not the smallest idea
that any of those deaths were in consequence of the least fault in his
execution of his business. I only mentioned them to shew that misfortunes
_may happen_ with the most able Man-midwife; and therefore that it is
cruel to name one or two accidents as proof of a woman’s being unsafe,
since they will happen to the first man in the whole world. I look on Dr.
Hunter as a most skilful anatomist; able physician; experienced, tender,
patient Man-midwife. If it was left to me to call any man to the labour
of a woman in imminent danger, and whose life was linked in mine, Dr.
Hunter is the man I would send for without a moment’s hesitation, his
skill, but, above all, his experience, AGE, and INFIRMITIES, render him
the ONLY man proper to be allowed _to take liberties_ with married women.
Yet _any woman of experience_, in my opinion, is _infinitely safer_ than
even Dr. Hunter, _except in very extraordinary cases_.
LETTER III.
In my two last letters, I believe I satisfied those _who are open to
conviction_, that _even the best_ Men-midwives are _not so safe_ as
women,—and that the custom is destructive of modesty, and affords those
Men-midwives _who chuse it_, finer seraglios than are in the possession
of the most luxuriant Monarchs of the East.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account