Denmark -- History -- To 1241; Folklore -- Scandinavia
The Saxons approached Hame, who was accounted their most famous
champion, with many offers, and promised him that, if he would lend his
services for the duel they would pay him his own weight in gold.
The fighter was tempted by the money, and, with all the ovation of a
military procession, they attended him to the ground appointed for the
combat. Thereupon the Danes, decked in warlike array, led Starkad, who
was to represent his king, out to the duelling-ground. Hame, in his
youthful assurance, despised him as withered with age, and chose to
grapple rather than fight with an outworn old man. Attacking Starkad, he
would have flung him tottering to the earth, but that fortune, who would
not suffer the old man to be conquered, prevented him from being hurt.
For he is said to have been so crushed by the fist of Hame, as he dashed
on him, that he touched the earth with his chin, supporting himself on
his knees. But he made up nobly for his tottering; for, as soon as he
could raise his knee and free his hand to draw his sword, he clove Hame
through the middle of the body. Many lands and sixty bondmen apiece were
the reward of the victory.
After Hame was killed in this manner the sway of the Danes over the
Saxons grew so insolent, that they were forced to pay every year a small
tax for each of their limbs that was a cubit (ell) long, in token of
their slavery. This Hanef could not bear, and he meditated war in his
desire to remove the tribute. Steadfast love of his country filled his
heart every day with greater compassion for the oppressed; and, longing
to spend his life for the freedom of his countrymen, he openly showed
a disposition to rebel. Frode took his forces over the Elbe, and killed
him near the village of Hanofra (Hanover), so named after Hanef. But
Swerting, though he was equally moved by the distress of his countrymen,
said nothing about the ills of his land, and revolved a plan for freedom
with a spirit yet more dogged than Hanef's. Men often doubt whether
this zeal was liker to vice or to virtue; but I certainly censure it as
criminal, because it was produced by a treacherous desire to revolt. It
may have seemed most expedient to seek the freedom of the country, but
it was not lawful to strive after this freedom by craft and treachery.
Therefore, since the deed of Swerting was far from honourable, neither
will it be called expedient; for it is nobler to attack openly him whom
you mean to attack, and to exhibit hatred in the light of day, than to
disguise a real wish to do harm under a spurious show of friendship. But
the gains of crime are inglorious, its fruits are brief and fading. For
even as that soul is slippery, which hides its insolent treachery by
stealthy arts, so is it right that whatsoever is akin to guilt should be
frail and fleeting. For guilt has been usually found to come home to its
author; and rumour relates that such was the fate of Swerting. For he
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account