[Sidenote: Weakness of the Visigoths.] In relating the history of the
Franks in Gaul, we have had occasion to point out the comparative ease
with which the Frank and the Roman provincial coalesced to form a new
nation. We have seen how from the first the Gaulish bishops were
employed as ministers and confidants by the Merovings, and how, in a
short time, Gallo-Roman counts and dukes were preferred to high places
in the Frankish palace and army. In Spain no such easy union between the
Teutonic conquerors and the provincials was possible, because the great
bar of religion lay between them. Unlike the Franks, the Visigoths were
Arians, having preserved the heretical form of Christianity which their
forefathers had learnt beyond the Danube in the fourth century. The
Spanish provincials, on the other hand, were almost to a man fanatically
orthodox. The Goths formed a religious community of their own, quite
apart from the Spaniards, with Arian bishops and priests to minister to
them; and their kings could not acknowledge or utilise the native
bishops as the Merovings had done in Gaul. The provincials hated their
rulers as heretics as well as barbarians, and never acquiesced willingly
in their domination. They were not indisposed to favour the advance of
the orthodox Frank, and welcomed the coming of the troops of the
East-Roman emperors to their shores in the sixth century. While the
Visigoths remained Arian they raised no Spaniard to power or office; it
was not till they became Catholic, in the very end of the sixth century,
that the first Roman names are found among the servants of the king.[19]
For the first seventy years of their rule in Spain the Visigoths were
completely estranged from their subjects (511-587).
Footnote 19:
The earliest notable case is duke Claudius, the general of king
Reccared I., the first orthodox ruler of Spain. He commanded
victoriously against the Franks of Guntram of Burgundy in 589.
The masters of Spain, then, were a not very numerous tribe, scattered
thinly among masses of an oppressed subject population. They were
masters by the power of the sword alone, but their military force was
crippled by the weakness of their elective kings, who were too much
occupied in maintaining their precarious authority over the discontented
chiefs to allow of their making their arms felt abroad. Nearly all the
wars of the Visigoths were either civil broils between rival kings, or
defensive campaigns against the intrusive Frank from beyond the
Pyrenees.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account