There is yet one more point to add to this picture of the distracted
realm of the Visigoths; they were not even masters of the whole of the
Iberian peninsula, but had to contend with fierce and watchful enemies
within its limits. In the western Pyrenees, and on the shores of the
Gulf of Biscay, the Basques preserved a precarious independence, and
descended from their fastnesses to plunder the valley of the Ebro,
whenever the Goths were engaged in civil discords. Farther to the west
there still subsisted in the ancient Galicia and Lusitania the kingdom
of the Suevi—the original Teutonic conquerors of Spain. The early
Visigothic kings had driven them into the mountains of the West, but had
never followed them into their last retreats, to compel them to make
complete submission. Suevic kings reigned at Braga over the country
north of the Tagus and west of the Esla and Tormes till the last years
of the sixth century. Whenever a favourable opportunity occurred, they
took part in the civil wars of the Visigoths, and harried the valley of
the upper Douro and the lower Tagus.
The inner organisation of the Visigothic realm presents a very different
picture from the centralised despotism, with everything depending on the
king, which we have described as existing among the early Franks in
Gaul. Like the Franks the Visigoths had divided their conquest into
districts, governed by counts or dukes, generally using as the unit of
division the old Roman boundaries of provinces and _civitates_. But the
Visigothic governors were far less under the control of their elective
kings than were the Frankish counts under the hand of the despotic
Merovingians. Each of them kept a body-guard of personal dependants
called—as among the Ostrogoths—_saiones_, or sometimes _bucellarii_,
whom he could trust to follow him even against the king. [Sidenote: The
Saiones.] It was the possession of this armed following among a
helpless, weaponless mass of provincials which enabled any count or duke
who was popular and ambitious to dare an attempt at rebellion, whenever
his master was weak or unfortunate. There seems to have been a
comparatively small body of lesser freeholders—_ceorls_ as they would
have been called in England—among the Visigoths. There is little trace
of any intermediate class between the nobles—whether official nobles,
_palatini_, or nobles of birth—and their sworn followers the _saiones_.
In fact, the kingdom might fairly be called feudal in its organisation,
consisting as it did of a servile population of Hispano-Roman blood,
held down by a sprinkling of Gothic men-at-arms, each bound by oath to
follow some great noble, who considered himself the equal of his king,
and vouchsafed him only the barest homage. As yet the king had no
opportunity of supporting himself by calling in to his aid either the
Church or the subject Roman population; his Arianism prevented him from
having recourse to any such expedient.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account