Sisibut reigned only eight years; he had taken the precaution to have
his son Reccared II. elected king by the national council during his own
lifetime, and on his death the youth succeeded to the throne without
molestation. But less than a year after Sisibut’s death Reccared
followed him to the grave, and the crown once more passed into a new
house.
[Sidenote: Swinthila, 620-31.] Count Swinthila, whom the Goths now chose
as king, was a general who had distinguished himself in the war with the
Basques, and had a great military reputation, but, unlike Sisibut, was
not a favourer of the Church party, and had to face its intrigues all
through the ten years of his reign. He was equally disliked by the great
nobles, whose powers he sought to curb by asserting the rights of the
smaller Gothic freeholders, who had for long been lapsing more and more
into feudal dependence on their greater neighbours. His care for their
interests won for him the title of the ‘Father of the Poor,’ and their
loyalty is no doubt the explanation of the fact that he was able to hold
the crown so long when both Church and nobles were against him. Nor was
his reign entirely without military successes. He took Lagos and the
fort on Cape St. Vincent, the two last Byzantine strongholds in Spain,
so that the whole peninsula was at last drawn under a single ruler. He
was equally successful against a rebellion of the Basques, and,
overrunning their mountain valleys in Navarre and Biscay, built the
fortress of Olite, beyond the Ebro and near Pampeluna, to hold them
down.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account