Gaiseric, or Genseric as the Romans sometimes called him, first of the
Vandal kings of Africa, was still reigning at Carthage in the year when
Odoacer became ruler of Italy. For forty-eight years did this first of
the Teutonic sea-kings bear sway in the land which he had won, and hold
the naval supremacy in the central Mediterranean. The creation of the
Vandal kingdom had been one of the most extraordinary feats of the time
of the great migrations, and must be attributed entirely to the personal
energy of their long-lived king. His tribe was one of the least numerous
of the many wandering hordes which had trespassed within the bounds of
the empire, no more than 80,000 souls, men, women, and children all
counted, when they first invaded Africa. [Sidenote: The Vandals in
Africa, 439-77.] That such a small army should have overrun a province a
thousand miles long, and should have become the terror of the whole
seaboard of the Western Empire was the triumph of Gaiseric’s ability. He
was not one of the stalwart, hard-fighting, brainless chiefs who were
generally to be found at the head of a German horde, but a man of very
moderate stature, limping all his life through from a kick that he got
from a horse in early youth. His mental powers alone made him
formidable, for he was not only a general of note, but a wily
politician, faithless not with the light and heady fickleness of a
savage, but with the deliberate and malicious treachery of a
professional intriguer. He was one of those not uncommon instances of a
Teuton, who, when brought into contact with the empire, picked up all
the vices of its decaying civilisation without losing those of his
original barbarism. It is not without some reason that the doings of
Gaiseric have left their mark on the history of language in the shape of
the modern word ‘Vandalism.’ The sufferings of Italy and Africa at his
hands were felt more deeply than the woes they had endured at the hands
of other invaders, because of the treachery and malice which inspired
them. Compared with Gaiseric, Alaric the Goth seemed a model of knightly
courtesy, and Attila the Hun a straightforward, if a brutal, enemy. The
Vandal king’s special foibles were the conclusion of treaties and
armistices which he did not intend to keep, and a large piratical
disregard for the need of any pretext or justification for his raids,
save indeed the single plea that the city or district that he attacked
was at that particular moment not in a good position to defend itself.
From his contact with the empire, Gaiseric had picked up the
characteristics of the two most odious types of the day—the
tax-collector and the persecuting ecclesiastical bigot. There was more
systematic financial oppression in Africa than in any of the other new
Germanic kingdoms, and far more spiteful persecution of religious
enemies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account