The Dawn of Modern Medicine: An Account of the Revival of the Science and Art of Medicine Which Took Place in Western Europe During the Latter Half of the Eighteenth Century and the First Part of the NineteenthBuck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
History
The Dawn of Modern Medicine: An Account of the Revival of the Science and Art of Medicine Which Took Place in Western Europe During the Latter Half of the Eighteenth Century and the First Part of the Nineteenth
Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
Medicine -- Europe -- History; Medicine -- History -- 18th century; Medicine -- History -- 19th century; Physicians -- Europe -- Biography
Up to the year 1638 Renaudot had got along very amicably with the Paris
Faculty. He had often consulted with them and he had entered the names
of his two sons, Isaac and Eusebius, as students at the medical school.
Furthermore, there could not have existed any prejudice against him on
religious grounds as—upon the advice of Richelieu and Father Joseph
(Leclerc du Tremblay, or “His Gray Eminence”)—his two sons had been
educated in the Roman Catholic faith. It appears, however, that these
favorable considerations were not strong enough to prevent professional
jealousy, on the part of the Paris physicians, from setting to work to
undermine all Renaudot’s good work. The real truth—viz., that the
newcomer’s success was robbing them of some of their paying practice—was
not confessed by these men openly, but instead they objected to his
having, with the King’s permission (granted in 1640), established
furnaces for the manufacture of chemical remedies. They also claimed
that he was injuring the profession of medicine through his doctrine
that good effects were obtainable from the employment of both opium and
antimony as internal remedies, and also through his maintenance of the
new doctrine (1616) of the circulation of the blood. Were not these
professional sins, they claimed, sufficiently heinous to justify them in
summoning him before the magistrates as an impostor? They believed that
they were fully justified in so doing; and accordingly they proceeded
without further delay to bring suit against Renaudot.
It would require much additional space to furnish here even a condensed
account of the events which characterized this disgraceful attack by the
Paris Faculty—and especially by Guy Patin, who was at that time its
Dean—against Renaudot, and I have therefore no hesitation in omitting
all but one or two further details of this part of Renaudot’s history.
In the first place, Cardinal Richelieu and the King stood firmly by
Renaudot to the very end; and, on July 14, 1641, the King’s Council
condemned the Faculty on all points of their charge, and in this manner
granted complete authorization to Renaudot’s work. He himself,
notwithstanding the great victory which he had won over his unscrupulous
enemies, all of them physicians of high social position, resumed his
efforts to win them over to a friendly attitude—not toward himself
individually, but toward the benevolent schemes which he was doing his
best to establish on a firm footing. All his efforts, however, toward
pacification proved of no avail.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account