The Dawn of Modern Medicine: An Account of the Revival of the Science and Art of Medicine Which Took Place in Western Europe During the Latter Half of the Eighteenth Century and the First Part of the Nineteenth — John Shaqi
The Dawn of Modern Medicine: An Account of the Revival of the Science and Art of Medicine Which Took Place in Western Europe During the Latter Half of the Eighteenth Century and the First Part of the NineteenthBuck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
History
The Dawn of Modern Medicine: An Account of the Revival of the Science and Art of Medicine Which Took Place in Western Europe During the Latter Half of the Eighteenth Century and the First Part of the Nineteenth
Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
Medicine -- Europe -- History; Medicine -- History -- 18th century; Medicine -- History -- 19th century; Physicians -- Europe -- Biography
In November of the year 1744 van Swieten was called to Brussels to see,
in consultation with her regular medical attendants, the Archduchess
Marianne, wife of Charles Alexander of Lorraine, and the sister of Maria
Theresa, Empress of Germany. She had recently been confined, after
having been in poor health for several months before this event. It was
therefore not surprising that at the delivery, on November 5, the child
was found to be dead. Shortly after the confinement the condition of the
Archduchess became rapidly worse, and it was then that Maria Theresa
sent her own physician, Dr. Engel, from Vienna to consult with van
Swieten and with her sister’s regular medical attendants. It appears
that these two leading physicians frequently disagreed as to what was
the best treatment to adopt; but van Swieten was so tactful in his
advocacy of the measures which he thought advisable and so courteous in
his intercourse with his professional associates that Prince Kaunitz,
the Imperial Austrian Chancellor, who happened to be in Brussels at this
time, wrote to the Empress in strongly commendatory terms of the
impression which van Swieten had made upon him. However, the hope which
the latter had held out with regard to the patient’s ultimate recovery
was not realized; she died on December 12. Notwithstanding his failure
to predict correctly the outcome of the Archduchess’ illness van Swieten
had succeeded so completely in impressing all the patient’s immediate
friends with his skill as a physician and with a genuine esteem for his
personal character that they had only praise to bestow upon the man in
their reports to the Empress. Maria Theresa’s mind was now entirely made
up as to the wisdom of calling van Swieten to Vienna and entrusting to
him the work of reorganizing the hospital management and the university
medical teaching in her capital, matters in which she took a very deep
interest. As soon as the decision reached by the Empress became
generally known in Vienna certain physicians of that city lost no time
in taking steps to thwart her plan. Scheming of this sort, however, had
to be done very cautiously, for it was not safe openly to oppose the
will of the sovereign. The first evidence of the existence of this
intrigue to prevent the appointment of van Swieten to a position of such
commanding importance in the medical world of Vienna appeared in a
Frankfort newspaper of January 9, 1745. After announcing the death of
the Archduchess Marianne at Brussels the article in question added the
following remarks: “The fatal issue, it appears, is to be attributed to
the unsuccessful treatment that was carried out by the local physicians
with whom van Swieten of Leyden was associated as the chief consultant;
it having been predicted from the very first by Dr. Engel, the imperial
Austrian physician, that this treatment, if adopted, would terminate
badly.” The Empress closed her ears to this and all similar calumnious
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account