The Dawn of the XIXth Century in England: A social sketch of the timesAshton, John
History
The Dawn of the XIXth Century in England: A social sketch of the times
Ashton, John
England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
The poor old century had lost us America, whose chief son, General
George Washington, died in 1799. In 1799 we were at war with France
truly, but England itself had not been menaced—the war was being
fought in Egypt. Napoleon had suddenly deserted his army there, and
had returned to France post-haste, for affairs were happening in Paris
which needed his presence, if his ambitious schemes were ever to ripen
and bear fruit. He arrived, dissolved the Council of Five Hundred,
and the Triumvirate consisting of himself, Cambacérès, and Le Brun
was formed. Then, whether in sober earnest, or as a bit of political
by-play, he wrote on Christmas day, 1799, the following message of
goodwill and peace:
“_Bonaparte, First Consul of the Republic, to His Majesty
the King of Great Britain and Ireland._
“Paris, 5 Nivôse, year VIII. of the Republic.
“Called by the wishes of the French nation to occupy the first
magistracy of the French Republic, I deem it desirable, in entering on
its functions, to make a direct communication to your Majesty.
“Must the war, which for four years has ravaged every part of the
world, be eternal? Are there no means of coming to an understanding?
“How can the two most enlightened nations of Europe, more powerful
and stronger than is necessary for their safety and independence,
sacrifice to the idea of a vain grandeur, the benefits of commerce, of
internal prosperity, and domestic happiness? How is it they do not
feel that peace is as glorious as necessary?
“These sentiments cannot be strangers to the heart of your Majesty,
who rules over a free nation, with no other view than to render them
happy.
“Your Majesty will only see in this overture, my sincere desire to
effectually contribute to a general pacification, by a prompt step,
free and untrammelled by those forms which, necessary perhaps to
disguise the apprehensions of feeble states, only prove, in the case
of strong ones, the mutual desire to deceive.
“France and England, by abusing their strength, may, for a long time
yet, to the misery of all other nations, defer the moment of their
absolute exhaustion; but I will venture to say, that the fate of all
civilized nations depends on the end of a war which envelopes the
whole world.
“(_Signed_) BONAPARTE.”
Fair as this looks to the eye, British statesmen could not even then,
in those early days, implicitly trust Napoleon, without some material
guarantee. True, all was not _couleur de rose_ with the French army and
navy. The battle of the Nile, and Acre, still were in sore remembrance.
Italy had emancipated itself, and Suwarrow had materially crippled the
French army. There were 140,000 Austrians hovering on the Rhine border,
and the national purse was somewhat flaccid. No doubt it would have
been convenient to Napoleon to have patched up a temporary peace in
order to recruit—but that would not suit England.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account