The Day of Sir Wilfrid Laurier: A Chronicle of Our Own Time — John Shaqi
The Day of Sir Wilfrid Laurier: A Chronicle of Our Own TimeSkelton, Oscar D. (Oscar Douglas)
History
The Day of Sir Wilfrid Laurier: A Chronicle of Our Own Time
Skelton, Oscar D. (Oscar Douglas)
Canada -- History -- 1867-1914; Laurier, Wilfrid, Sir, 1841-1919
In Canada these successive conflicts had found many echoes. During the
French regime Gallican principles of the power of the king over the
Church had been frequently asserted; governor or intendant had, in a
few notable instances, endeavoured to bridle the Church authorities.
When the English came, the Church lost its place as the state church,
but it consolidated its power, and soon was freer from intervention
than it had been under the Most Christian King of France. During the
French Revolution Canada was kept {28} isolated from contact with
France, but after the Restoration, with ultramontanism in the
ascendant, intercourse was favoured; and the most thoroughgoing
principles of clerical supremacy, with the most militant methods of
controversy, found lodgment here. In both private and public life,
among clergy as well as laity, each of the opposing tendencies was
stoutly championed.
When Wilfrid Laurier went to Montreal in 1861, the leaders of the
Liberal or _Rouge_ party had sobered down from the fiery radicalism of
their youth, and were content to leave the authorities of the Church
alone. But leading authorities of the Church remained suspicious of
that party. Bishop Bourget of Montreal, one of the most pious and
energetic of ecclesiastics, firm to the point of obstinacy, seemed
determined to crush it out. And though many eminent churchmen held out
for a broader and more tolerant policy, the ultramontanes, by reason of
their crusading zeal, steadily gained the ascendancy.
The issues raised in Quebec were manifold. Among them were the right
of private judgment, the authority of canon law in the province, civil
or ecclesiastical control over marriage, clerical immunity from the
{29} jurisdiction of civil courts, and the degree of intervention which
was permissible to the clergy in elections.
The first question, that of the right of private judgment, concerned
the future leader of Canadian Liberalism and became acute in connection
with the _Institut Canadien_ of Montreal. This was a literary and
scientific society, founded in 1844 by some members of the same group
who later organized the _Rouge_ party. It supplied the want of a
public library and reading-room in Montreal, and a hundred branches
sprang up throughout the province. The _Institut_ soon fell under the
suspicion of a section of the clergy. It was declared by Bishop
Bourget that immoral or heretical books which had been put on the
_Index_ were contained in the library. Rival societies were founded
under the auspices of the Church and many of the members of the
_Institut_ were induced to secede.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account