The Day of Sir Wilfrid Laurier: A Chronicle of Our Own TimeSkelton, Oscar D. (Oscar Douglas)
History
The Day of Sir Wilfrid Laurier: A Chronicle of Our Own Time
Skelton, Oscar D. (Oscar Douglas)
Canada -- History -- 1867-1914; Laurier, Wilfrid, Sir, 1841-1919
opinion in Canada anticipated a 'promenade to Pretoria,' and was only
afraid that the fighting would be all over before our men arrived. It
was just another of Britain's 'little wars.'
The real source of the demand that Canada should now take a part lay in
the new-born imperial and national consciousness. The crisis served to
precipitate the emotions and opinions which had been vaguely floating
in the Canadian mind. The Jubilee festivities and the British
preference had increased imperial sentiment; and, with returning
prosperity and rapid growth, national pride was getting the better of
colonial dependence. A curious element in this pride was the sense of
rivalry with the United States, which had just won more or less glory
in a little war with Spain. All these sentiments, fanned by vigorous
newspaper appeal, led to the wish to {188} do something tangible to
show that the day of passive loyalty was over and the day of
responsible partnership had begun.
Sir Wilfrid Laurier was faced with a difficult problem. He had not
expected war. 'I had hoped to the last,' he said later, 'that there
would be no war ... that the Uitlanders would get their rights from Mr
Kruger's Government, not by the use of force but simply by the means of
reason applied to the case.' Now he was suddenly called upon to decide
one of the most momentous issues that had ever confronted the Canadian
people. He had to decide it in the midst of a rising tide of popular
enthusiasm in the English-speaking provinces. Equally he had to take
into account the lukewarmness or hostility of Quebec. The majority of
French Canadians stood where their English-speaking fellow-citizens had
stood ten or twenty years before. They were passively loyal, content
to be a protected colony. The instinctive sympathies of many would be
for the Boer minority rather than for the English Outlanders in the
Transvaal. We may read the prime minister's thoughts on this aspect of
the problem from his own words, addressed to an audience in Toronto:
{189}
Blood is thicker than water, and the issue may not appeal to my
fellow-countrymen of French origin as it appealed to you.... Still we
are British subjects, and claim the rights of British subjects, and we
assume all the responsibilities this entails. There are men foolish
enough, there are men unpatriotic enough, to blame us and to say that I
should have rushed on and taken no precautions to guide public opinion
in my own province. That is not my way of governing the country. I
told you a moment ago that I would not swim with the current, that I
would endeavour to guide the current, and on this occasion I tried to
do so.
Moreover, parliament was not in session, and British precedent required
the consent of parliament for waging war.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account