The dead towns of GeorgiaJones, Charles C., Jr. (Charles Colcock)
History
The dead towns of Georgia
Jones, Charles C., Jr. (Charles Colcock)
Extinct cities -- Georgia; Georgia -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
At the inception of the Revolutionary war the coast defenses of Georgia
were in a most pitiable and dilapidated condition. All her forts were in
ruins, or nearly so. On the 20th of September, 1773, Sir James Wright,—who
makes no mention of any defensive work at Sunbury,—reports Fort George
on Cockspur island, which was built in 1762 of mud walls faced with
palmetto logs, with a caponiere inside to serve for officers’ apartments,
as “almost in ruins, and garrisoned only by an officer and three men,
just to make signals, &c.” Fort Halifax, within the town of Savannah,
constructed in 1759 and 1760, and made of plank filled in with earth,
with the exception of two of its caponieres, was totally down and unfit
for use. Fort Frederick, at Frederica, erected by General Oglethorpe
when his regiment was stationed there, had been without a garrison for
upwards of eight years, and although some of its tabby walls remained,
the entire structure was fast passing into decay. Fort Augusta, in the
town of Augusta, made of three-inch plank, had been neglected since 1767
and was rotten in every part. Fort Barrington on the Alatamaha river was
in like condition. Of the fort at New Ebenezer, of Fort William on the
southern extremity of Cumberland island, of Fort Argyle, and of the other
minor defenses erected in the early days of the Colony, scarce a vestige
remained.
[Illustration: _Fort Morris_
_J. Bien, Photo. Lith. N. Y._]
Located some three hundred and fifty yards due south of Sunbury, and
occupying the bluff where it first confronts Midway river as, trending
inward from the sound, it bends to the north, Fort Morris was intended
to cover not only the direct water approach to the town, but also the
back river by means of which that place might be passed and taken in
reverse. Its position was well chosen for defensive purposes. To the south
stretched a wide-spread and impracticable marsh permeated by Pole-haul
and Dickerson creeks,—two tributaries of Midway river,—whose mouths were
commanded by the guns of the fort. This marsh also extended in front of
the work, constituting a narrow and yet substantial protection against
landing parties, and gradually contracting as it approached the southern
boundary of Sunbury. This fortification was an enclosed earth-work,
substantially constructed. Its walls embraced a parade about an acre in
extent. The eastern face, confronting the river, was two hundred and
seventy-five feet in length. Here the heaviest guns were mounted. The
northern and southern faces were respectively one hundred and ninety-one,
and one hundred and forty feet in length, while the curtain, looking to
the west, was two hundred and forty-one feet long. Although quadrangular,
the work was somewhat irregular in shape. From the southern face and the
curtain, no guns could be brought to bear upon the river. Those there
mounted served only for defense against a land attack. The armament of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account