The decay and the restoration of civilization : $b The philosophy of civilization, part 1 — John Shaqi
The decay and the restoration of civilization : $b The philosophy of civilization, part 1Schweitzer, Albert
Philosophy
The decay and the restoration of civilization : $b The philosophy of civilization, part 1
Schweitzer, Albert
Civilization -- History
In justification of this optimism appeal is made, both rightly and
wrongly, to Hegel. It cannot be denied that he is the spiritual father
of our sense of reality; he is the first thinker who tried to be just
[pg 057] to things as they exist. We have been trained by him to
realize the method of progress in thesis, antithesis, and synthesis as
they show themselves in the course of events. But his optimism was not
a simple optimism about facts, as ours is. He lived still in the
spiritual world of rationalism, and believed in the power of ethical
ideas worked out by reason; that was why he believed also in the
certainty of uninterrupted spiritual progress. And it was because this
was something upon which he could rely that he undertook to show how
it was to be seen in the successive phases of events, and at the same
time how it made itself a reality in the stream of outward facts. By
emphasizing, however, the progressive purpose, which he finds immanent
in the course of events, so strongly that it is possible to forget the
ethical-spiritual presuppositions of his belief in progress, he is
preparing the way for the despiritualized optimism about reality which
has for decades been misleading us. Between the facts themselves there
is nothing but an endless series of contradictions.The fresh mediating
fact in which they counteract each other so as to make progress
possible they cannot of themselves produce. This fact can only assert
itself if the contradictions resolve themselves in a reasoned view in
which there are ethical ideas about the condition of things which [pg
058] it is sought to realize. These are the formative principles for
the new element which is to arise out of the contradictories, and it
is only in this reasoned ethical view that the latter cease to be
blind, leading to no issue.
It was because we assumed the existence of principles, of progress, in
the facts, that we viewed the advance of history, in which our future
was being prepared, as progress in civilization, even though evolution
condemned our optimism. And even now, when facts of the most terrible
character cry out loudly against it, we shrink from giving up our
creed. It no longer, indeed, gives us any real enlightenment, but the
alternative, which bases optimism on belief in the ethical spirit,
means such a revolution in our mode of thought that we find it
difficult to take it into consideration.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account