The decay and the restoration of civilization : $b The philosophy of civilization, part 1Schweitzer, Albert
Philosophy
The decay and the restoration of civilization : $b The philosophy of civilization, part 1
Schweitzer, Albert
Civilization -- History
At present, certainly, the majority do not, as a rule, attain to any
properly thought-out theory, nor do they feel the need of deriving
their ideas and convictions from such a source. They are in tune, more
or less, with all the tones which pervade the age in which they live.
But who are the musicians who have produced these tones? They are the
personalities who have thought out theories of the universe, and drawn
from them the ideas, more or less valuable, which are current amongst
us to-day. In this way all thoughts, whether those of individuals or
those of society, go back ultimately, in some way or other, to a
theory of the universe. Every age lives in the consciousness of what
has been provided for it by the thinkers under whose influence it
stands.
Plato was wrong in holding that the philosophers of a State should
also be its governors. Their supremacy is a different and a higher one
than that which consists in taking cognizance of laws and ordinances
and giving effect to official authority. [pg 082] They are the
officers of the general staff who sit in the background thinking out,
with more or less clearness of vision, the details of the battle which
is to be fought. Those who play their part in the public eye are the
subordinate officers who, for their variously sized units, convert the
general directions of the staff into orders of the day: namely, that
the forces will start at such and such a time, move in this or that
direction, and occupy this or that point. Kant and Hegel have
commanded millions who had never read a line of their writings, and
who did not even know that they were obeying their orders.
Those who command, whether it be in a large or a small sphere, can
only carry out what is already in the thought of the age. They do not
build the instrument on which they have to play, but are merely given
a seat at it. Nor do they compose the piece they have to play; it is
simply put before them, and they cannot alter it; they can only
reproduce it with more or less skill and success. If it is
meaningless, they cannot do much to improve it, but neither, if it is
good, can they damage it seriously.
To the question, then, whether it is personalities or ideas which
decide the fate of an age, the answer is that the age gets its ideas
from personalities. If the thinkers of a certain period produce a
worthy theory of the universe, then ideas pass into currency [pg 083]
which guarantee progress; if they are not capable of such production,
then decadence sets in in some form or other. Every theory of the
universe draws after it its own special results in history.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account