The decline of the West, Volume 1 : $b Form and actualitySpengler, Oswald
Philosophy
The decline of the West, Volume 1 : $b Form and actuality
Spengler, Oswald
Civilization -- History
What then was it that Classical man, whose insight into his own world-
around was certainly not less piercing than ours, regarded as the prime
problem of all being? It was the problem of ἀρχή, the _material origin
and foundation_ of all sensuously-perceptible things. If we grasp this
we shall get close to the significance of the fact—not the fact of
space, but the fact that made it a necessity of destiny for the space-
problem to become the problem of the Western, and only the Western,
soul.[188] This very spatiality (Räumlichkeit) that is the truest and
sublimest element in the aspect of _our_ universe, that absorbs into
itself and begets out of itself the substantiality of all things,
Classical humanity (which knows no word for, and therefore has no idea
of, space) with one accord cuts out as the nonent, τὸ μὴ ὄν, that which
_is not_. The pathos of this denial can scarcely be exaggerated. The
whole passion of the Classical soul is in this act of excluding by
symbolic negation that which it _would_ not feel as actual, that in
which its own existence _could_ not be expressed. A world of other
colour suddenly confronts us here. The Classical statue in its splendid
bodiliness—all structure and expressive surfaces and no incorporeal
_arrière-pensée_ whatsoever—contains without remainder all that
Actuality is for the Classical eye. The material, the optically
definite, the comprehensible, the immediately present—this list exhausts
the characteristics of this kind of extension. The Classical universe,
the _Cosmos_ or well-ordered aggregate of all near and completely
viewable things, is concluded by the corporeal vault of heaven. More
there is not. The need that is in us to think of “space” as being behind
as well as before this shell was wholly absent from the Classical world-
feeling. The Stoics went so far as to treat even properties and
relations of things as “bodies.” For Chrysippus, the Divine Pneuma is a
“body,” for Democritus seeing consists in our being penetrated by
material particles of the things seen. The State is a body which is made
up of all the bodies of its citizens, the law knows only corporeal
persons and material things. And the feeling finds its last and noblest
expression in the stone body of the Classical temple. The windowless
interior is carefully concealed by the array of columns; but outside
there is not one truly straight line to be found. Every flight of steps
has a slight sweep outward, every step relatively to the next. The
pediment, the roof-ridge, the sides are all curved. Every column has a
slight swell and none stand truly vertical or truly equidistant from one
another. But swell and inclination and distance vary from the corners to
the centres of the sides in a carefully toned-off ratio, and so the
whole corpus is given a something that swings mysterious about a centre.
The curvatures are so fine that to a certain extent they are invisible
to the eye and only to be “sensed.” But it is just by these means that
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account