The decline of the West, Volume 1 : $b Form and actualitySpengler, Oswald
Philosophy
The decline of the West, Volume 1 : $b Form and actuality
Spengler, Oswald
Civilization -- History
Consider, again, the beautiful notion of _uniting the round arch and the
column_; this again is a Syrian, if not a North-Arabian, creation of the
third (or “high Gothic”) century.[266] The revolutionary importance of
this motive, which is specifically Magian, has never in the least degree
been recognized; on the contrary, it has always been assumed to be
Classical, and for most of us indeed it is even representatively
Classical. The Egyptians ignored any deep relation between the roof and
the column; the latter was for them a plant-column, and represented not
stoutness but growth. Classical man, in his turn, for whom the
monolithic column was the mightiest symbol of Euclidean existence—all
body, all unity, all steadiness—connected it, in the strictest
proportions of vertical and horizontal, of strength and load, with his
architrave. But here, in this union of arch and column which the
Renaissance in its tragicomic deludedness admired as expressly Classical
(though it was a notion that the Classical neither possessed nor could
possess), the bodily principle of load and inertia is rejected and the
arch is made to spring clear and open out of the slender column. The
idea actualized here is at once a liberation from all earth-gravity and
a capture of space, and between this element and that of the dome which
soars free but yet encloses the great “cavern,” there is the deep
relation of like meaning. The one and the other are eminently and
powerfully Magian, and they come to their logical fulfilment in the
“Rococo” stage of Moorish mosques and castles, wherein ethereally
delicate columns—often growing out of, rather than based on, the ground—
seem to be empowered by some secret magic to carry a whole world of
innumerable notched arcs, gleaming ornaments, stalactites, and vaultings
saturated with colours. The full importance of this basic form of
Arabian architecture may be expressed by saying that the combination of
column and architrave is the Classical, that of column and round arch
the Arabian, and that of pillar and pointed arch the Faustian Leitmotiv.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account