The Depot for Prisoners of War at Norman Cross, Huntingdonshire. 1796 to 1816Walker, Thomas (Thomas James)
History
The Depot for Prisoners of War at Norman Cross, Huntingdonshire. 1796 to 1816
Walker, Thomas (Thomas James)
France -- History -- 1789-1815; Norman Cross depot; Prisoners of war
“Transport Office, Dorset Square, Westminster, established in August
1794, for the purpose of conducting the transport business which had
hitherto been transacted by the Navy Office; it has also the care of
the prisoners of war. It was at first managed by three
commissioners, but the business having much increased two more were
added in the year 1795. The salary of each commissioner is a
thousand a year. They have under them, several resident agents at
the different sea-ports both at home and abroad, to superintend the
particular service of embarking, re-embarking of troops, etc., and
seeing that the contracts made in this particular service are
strictly adhered to. These agents are captains and lieutenants of
the Royal Navy. There are also several agents afloat. The captains
have one guinea a day; the lieutenants fifteen shillings, and
nineteen shillings more per month for a servant. At the conclusion
of the war in 1802, the Board was reduced to three commissioners;
Capt. Schank retired on a pension of £500 per annum, and Joseph Hunt,
Esq., was removed to the ordnance as clerk of the deliveries.
_Commissioners_.
Hugh Cloberry Christian, Esq., afterwards Sir Hugh, K.B.
Philip Patten, Esq.
Ambrose Serle, Esq.
September 1795.
Rupert George, Esq.
John Schank, Esq.
Wm. Albany Otway, Esq.
John Marsh, Esq.
Ambrose Serle, Esq.
January 1799.
Joseph Hunt, Esq., _vice_ March. {7}
In order properly to understand the establishment of the Depot at Norman
Cross, it is necessary to briefly review the events which led up to it.
It arose at a very momentous era in our history. It was not officially
called a barracks, or a prison, but a Depot. At that time there were few
barracks in England, practically none, and what we term garrison towns
were very scarce. Our regular army was abroad fighting, and the internal
defence was in the hands of the Militia and Yeomanry. Service in the
former was compulsory, but substitutes could be purchased, so that it is
easy to judge who would actually serve, especially at a time when
scarcity and high prices were the rule, while the Militia were well fed.
In the Yeomanry were enrolled the gentry and well-to-do persons of each
locality; this was a very large force. There was a special troop of
Norman Cross Yeomanry, in which the farmers and others from the
neighbouring villages gave their services, and there were one or more
troops in Peterborough and the neighbouring towns. The duty mainly
consisted in putting down the various small riots that arose in different
parts of the country. In their travels they were “billeted” on the
publicans and the public at a tariff fixed by the Government, and which,
not being very extravagant, gave rise to much dissatisfaction,
oppression, and fraud.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account