The Deseado Formation of PatagoniaLoomis, Frederic Brewster
Science
The Deseado Formation of Patagonia
Loomis, Frederic Brewster
Paleontology -- Patagonia (Argentina and Chile)
[Footnote 3: Formations Sedimentaires, p. 498, Anal. Mus. Nac. Buenos
Aires, ser. 3, t. 8.]
[Footnote 4: Neues Jarhbuch fur Mineralogie. bd. 21, p. 193.]
[Footnote 5: Princeton Expeditions Reports, vol. 4, p. 303.]
Without going into the history of the various positions which
different authors have taken, and which will be found given in detail
in Wilckens’ paper, or in less detail in Ortmann’s, we will consider
the positions of the most recent students of the question. Ameghino
postulates a marine and a continental series of deposits being laid
down more or less simultaneously. In the marine series below the
Deseado, which is grouped as Guarantic, he places the Luisa, the Roca
and the Salamanca, followed by a hiatus, then the Sehuen, which in turn
is followed by another hiatus and the end of the Cretaceous is reached.
The Patagonian is his Eocene. Parallel to the marine series is the
terrestrial, where the Casamayor (= Notostylops) is contemporaneous
with the Salamanca, the Deseado with the Sehuen, and the Colpodon,
the Notohippus and Astrapothericulus with the Patagonian, thus making
the Deseado of Cretaceous age. After a very detailed study of a large
series of Patagonian fossils, Ortmann concludes that the Patagonian
is of Lower Miocene age. This is the most detailed study which has
been made. Wilckens coincides with this view, though feeling that
the Patagonian may have extended down a trifle into the last of the
Oligocene. This latter author finds a long gap between the Upper
Cretaceous and the Patagonian, a period when Patagonia was above
water. It was during this interval that the Casamayor, the Deseado
and possibly other beds were deposited on the continent. I have gone
over Ortmann’s argument, and studied a large collection of Patagonian
fossils, both vertebrate and invertebrate, of my own; and while there
are some places where we would like further data, I can come to no
other conclusion but that these Patagonian beds are Lower Miocene, the
exact relationship with beds in North America and Europe, being as yet
not definitely settled, nor will this be possible until a study of the
migrations of the elements of the Patagonian fauna has been made.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account