The Deseado Formation of PatagoniaLoomis, Frederic Brewster
Science
The Deseado Formation of Patagonia
Loomis, Frederic Brewster
Paleontology -- Patagonia (Argentina and Chile)
---+----------------------+--------------------+--------------------
13 | Antorbital foramen | 1 foramen | 1 foramen
---+----------------------+--------------------+--------------------
14 | Intercellular laminae| None | None
---+----------------------+--------------------+--------------------
15 | Atlas |Long, |Short,
| | no hypophysis | no hypophysis
---+----------------------+--------------------+--------------------
16 | Axis | Peg like odontoid |Odontoid slightly
| | | flattened on top
---+----------------------+--------------------+--------------------
17 | Cervicals 3-7 | Moderately long | Short
---+----------------------+--------------------+--------------------
18 | Humerus |Rounded no spur |Flattened distally,
| | on deltoid ridge | tiny spur on
| | | deltoid ridge
---+----------------------+--------------------+--------------------
19 | Radius and Ulna | Moderate length | Fairly long
| | |
---+----------------------+--------------------+--------------------
20 | Femur |Rounded, |Rounded,
| | Gr. trochanter | Gr. trochanter
| | high, | very low,
| | 3rd trochanter | no 3rd trochanter
---+----------------------+--------------------+--------------------
21 | Tibia |Moderate length, |Moderate length,
| | fused to fibula | free from fibula
| | at upper end |
---+----------------------+--------------------+--------------------
Still other forms like _Amblypoda_ and _Arsinotherium_ have been
suggested as having characters in common with _Pyrotherium_, and it
is clear that, with such a variety of forms, some of the characters
must be parallelisms due to a common adaptation, and only one
of these varied groups can be the one to which _Pyrotherium_ is
related. For myself, I have made comparisons with the _Amblypoda_ and
_Arsinotherium_, and feel that such features as the massive limbs,
shape of individual bones, etc., are due simply to the fact that all
these are massive animals. In the case of _Arsinotherium_, there are
some characters which are also common to hyracoids and elephants, like
the position of various basicranial foramena, the prolongation backward
of the jugal and the shape of the palatines. My conclusion is that
_Pyrotherium_ is related to the proboscideans, and came from the same
stock which gave rise to hyracoids, elephants and _Arsinotherium_. I
think further that _Pyrotherium_ belongs definitely to the proboscidean
line.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account